Re: [arch-d] ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25443A11A7 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:45:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NVZO8u0uehVD for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B59C3A11A6 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id t23so2208875wmi.1 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:45:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=TyNblg2HrfFbeCK0H0iVm9uKHW7WROyNbrQfv8omP5E=; b=pr424T2yt7GRCZZLc0DhWvihBLOm+C/OoCtU0jFIVS8ku8NAeZ7bqiqF7Id6dszi5p APOwJhTtsTDyq4CAuY08nOPddNqoKuw/oJxQ925QyNmMWpZthcxbmYoyHgiRbJBMXbf7 c6yWpw9XF7CJDQTQdTYtnIYQ64S3KPfIGrg9I3bIXOhYFrb+7iX5vsz3vpClRMhNbNIu p7+VrPflnfuh6hGvpc3lRg8cXG4kekxMQDL4+XYvfzksDFyXx/oJ7H6aKlODPBVmNKbO SoAS1IK3bhn/XFN/q9CVJ8NAZDRMQ3aWwn5pMJ5AJxDd2BJH7bJNzQdRDgvIvFbkNYC0 TOYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=TyNblg2HrfFbeCK0H0iVm9uKHW7WROyNbrQfv8omP5E=; b=CE1xPOmJ8ZFWNcBIA+npLNwK3X9FhRuW1lkyyMZvgtOLsxKhT72SI9pwfFte/NusTS Rm7+aqtN3LOSrVll299q8EeSM0SS5WakzfSFAbHcEZBOe+pvQFcGGzmJnAhO3BKXOxrR w51i6IboRFtcof8TD6hpTS5D/Xk/SlTgaOEgxMuDZ2ig9vG26XzCLIeu9hOhrXkY3CPB QhNOJfuyrY9vB+N6IfpYXWFw4u384ZpCsltL0yfJyERSFKY9lYxxVHhK0YbRJkrCvucs v+LZD92fpmbLPdr6kNkHrknSEaBcaekw12k/kWGuSsHBPPJohw7efRykFvgNKyWpocZ8 6IcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUmkTKcQjsQs33EhLYGw+6Ogzc5H/YB1RBEACmJQ7EfjnHa2jP+ ZuTNlJbTG55/wzrAFWTcWac=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqybxwPSpTi2FfDoFSZFKjjUs+VwG7NCaDjTqwyS6uxorrRFJA4LPyDP+aMuoQV5qLHq/uh1dw==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7dd4:: with SMTP id y203mr4597373wmc.67.1582710333038; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:45:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from appleton.fritz.box ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q1sm2437655wrw.5.2020.02.26.01.45.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 01:45:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <AD92F2D0-C95C-417D-8AEF-3A3B76C33776@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_14D04969-DB4F-43D6-9065-6B92D52F5CA1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:45:32 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20200224222715.GA49892@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
References: <PR3P194MB0843ACAE01F33CEC57266A1AAE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <EDAE6375-EE0B-4864-9834-C1FBC209D581@sobco.com> <PR3P194MB08431E138262F2A43C1D0621AE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <8ADEA0E1-291A-4400-9925-F65A26116372@consulintel.es> <PR3P194MB0843939F3B38426960A66E70AE130@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <D8063303-7DDA-41F8-A63A-C0244E3E9E25@isc.org> <20200224222715.GA49892@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/VLliXsnkCOIjK-vElXrpefWRCcw>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:45:39 -0000


> On 24 Feb 2020, at 22:27, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> I am primarily concerned that we did manage to recognize we needed
> disruptive innovartion in the 90th, when we came up with IPv6, but
> now the predominant religion seems to be being stuck in small
> incremental enhancements of that 25 year old architecture, especially
> because its bible (RFC8200) did only think of the IPv6 Internet use-case
> requirements, but not those of private/controlled networks.

I agree.

It is more that just the issue of private/controlled networks, the Internet itself is changing and the end to end model as we espouse is breaking is becoming a minority activity.

Anyone that has not done so already should read

target: https://hknog.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/01_GeoffHuston_TheDeath_of_Transit_and_Beyond.pdf
title: The Death of Transit and Beyond
author:
      name: Geoff Huston

It took us forever to recognise the reality of NATs, and I fear that we are failing to recognise the opportunities,  weaknesses and threats that the edge server and app centric model present.

- Stewart