IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] Centralization or diversity

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 08 January 2020 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6A312013D for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 07:30:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0QSi_dmpDe8Q for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 07:30:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0329B12001A for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 07:30:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id u1so3744087ljk.7 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:30:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xxjea1rxtcNRxwP43h1EfHFrhTIAyGpP09wQxvNMxOo=; b=FE4soxVQ8n/8zEDvCwRma7jhAF8MePYxnTVNitqJeAEL4i8F4p18ZE9oCQ3GB5yT71 yDXz0WNrZ3xVETWfr5h6w3A6e1skcCSGorfveCA1vxDO4U8Voh/v5VIQByUbMLBDJOi2 AV1kjBwgixFYrwpUCAnu6xLt8tL9wigT/5teMjuqrXWz0rbrLVU90IQ4c4v23ul/4GNz dpxeC7H+8ySXpiKcqGc4MGOFStrSUTCG1iGlYeZX73DC9pOLKOyEtPe2rSLmY3UQmF0N Y6rv4L6twFYexUDbFVJjEeKQY39g03havmMAN0e0e5FMIiiIzrBPvYoJkLF4luenJjwg aGVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xxjea1rxtcNRxwP43h1EfHFrhTIAyGpP09wQxvNMxOo=; b=sFbXJbFr2UtPQAiiMEwRqdCJumkROtQ9D5yzEBbdTCufzmT4wpdPocKnL3yIl7yvgs ebZRyGc/t0QSgRHPkjp/CX/afjlDeuhr7gPGLQIOU8giZgNEiNU8ZrF+33AK/J2BxL97 B1xAJK+Qj6Obapb3El/nDTcvY9uGmVSW3kCmPnqKjz3JWcLQ63CmCdph0gTwyPhgn3rc zg25ja5z4o6PKtlCsxMIEFAeeWG56/4ljHPQIqsORepxBlABKA/cV2KdTKSCmy2reB4T od67k4tjmZW9/lo2kG2IlhJVJgluRaDNb3xbPqYOgGromQOxrySJ4UXhbUzOLklK4V5f Xwog==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXVyDIAe4tufhO0HEAyHKcFYcPxnWbtpgymY5TGLl7qPECUNYJ7 dllUA0ObdAII3CfqC7UzrxCjQ2BcXqTaquR6IbI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKoEwzbv2Wap6t1ptMZSUJta8HGDoP1EJw39McNZPY7nCR0JOJPhRnQkOs8OY0F+iTwEXM8ITrnk37onIJTcw=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9596:: with SMTP id w22mr3202846ljh.21.1578497400248; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:30:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <LO2P265MB0573A1353911BFDD554DE5C8C2760@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAKKJt-dtX4kceJqY4kaB-vg4rs0uEn01SyyzR4m+UAO_0bZ=7g@mail.gmail.com> <c2633b3d-d114-217a-efca-2002bca9a084@gmail.com> <2D994CF8-8C96-405B-A4EF-65672EF31031@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <2D994CF8-8C96-405B-A4EF-65672EF31031@tony.li>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 09:29:31 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-edUA_OqHF_GPEONBa98LrQnmu-GrWUnDs=D1=w1EceFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: tony.li@tony.li
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d21d8b059ba29084"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/rIaWC7c5bnioevD4808juLGKNcs>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Centralization or diversity
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 15:30:04 -0000

Hi, Tony,

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:35 PM <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

>
> It's not quite clear how to enforce this via the IETF, beyond the multiple
> interoperable implementations of RFC6410.
>
>
>
> The IETF has no police force, thankfully, so enforcement is out of
> question anyway.
>
> The good news, however, is that Murphy does have a police force and has
> demonstrated repeatedly that genetic diversity in a network is a Very Good
> Thing.
>
> Several ISPs who have learned this lesson the hard way have dual planar
> networks where plane 1 is all vendor A and plane 2 is all vendor B.
>
> Some others still have to learn this.  One of the good things that might
> come of this effort is to write this down.
>

Thanks - that was my hope :-)

Spencer


> Tony
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email