IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arcmedia] FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia

Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> Thu, 01 January 2015 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F399E1A0383 for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 02:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLAsLsbzRdox for <arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 02:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay12.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay12.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066B91A0381 for <arcmedia@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 02:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.207]) by relay12.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1Y6coE-0003jH-dz; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:16:50 +0000
Received: from gklyne.plus.com ([80.229.154.156] helo=cheery.atuin.ninebynine.org) by smtp4.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gk@ninebynine.org>) id 1Y6coE-0001uR-DT; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:16:50 +0000
Message-ID: <54A51EA1.8090900@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:17:05 +0000
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, arcmedia@ietf.org
References: <CAL0qLwYdnW+o4WUb72VM6yuEP8-jBxQ-KgYQm7KP2Sq9E6dp5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPRnXtkg5GzLmPOWP=DrV8gTvgV+XDhOi=n3OZ86Yrhw+hOgJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwad-UcKECA=m7Zqhw+VZ6wy=bFPVKs_ik+fqjPW7-U7cQ@mail.gmail.com> <54A41D6C.9010501@ninebynine.org> <DM2PR0201MB096001DD5DBB2C67ED9BFE53C35C0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0201MB096001DD5DBB2C67ED9BFE53C35C0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcmedia/bc20NzLiSzN_IP4lxVgegBjTLZA
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 09:23:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [arcmedia] FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
X-BeenThere: arcmedia@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of creating a new top-level media type, \"archive\", for archive bundles." <arcmedia.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcmedia@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:16:54 -0000

On 01/01/2015 00:02, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Happy new year...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Masinter
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 4:01 PM
> To: 'Graham Klyne'; Murray S. Kucherawy; Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Cc: arcmedia@ietf.org; IETF Apps Discuss
> Subject: RE: [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
>
> I think the arcmedia WG charter should take into the W3C TAG work on packaging/archives
>
> http://w3ctag.github.io/packaging-on-the-web/

Agreed.  But noting that there could be some differences in emphasis, as that 
format is not intended to be an *archive* format.   Which I guess begs a 
question here: should the charter focus to be on *archive* or more broadly on 
multiple-file packaging formats?  (I'm not sure what difference that would make 
in practice, but I have a feeling some archival specialists might have something 
to add about this.)  I lean to the latter, but "archive format" is a more 
concise description.

In particular, if suggesting a common fragment identifier format, I think the 
specification in the W3C document could be useful to consider for adoption.

#g
--

>
> (W3c-tag bcc)
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: apps-discuss [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Graham Klyne
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 8:00 AM
>> To: Murray S. Kucherawy; Stian Soiland-Reyes
>> Cc: arcmedia@ietf.org; IETF Apps Discuss
>> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
>>
>> Re:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/current/msg00001.html
>>
>> I think the suggested charter looks pretty good.  The work seems
>> well-scoped to me.
>>
>> I'd expect to review at least the proposed base document, and maybe
>> some of the initial registrations.
>>
>> #g
>> --
>>
>>
>> On 30/12/2014 18:13, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
>>> soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi - what's the status of the chartering of the arcmedia WG? I
>>>> don't see that it has been added to http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/
>>>> and there is no further emails on the arcmedia mailing list.
>>>>
>>>
>>> A mailing list was created shortly after the November meeting, and
>>> the proposed charter was posted there and here.  There has been no
>>> response of any kind.
>>>
>>> -MSK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> apps-discuss mailing list
>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email