[armd] datacenter reference architecture draft

Manish Karir <mkarir@merit.edu> Fri, 28 October 2011 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mkarir@merit.edu>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E0021F8AC9 for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g06DHsAVDsmY for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from merit-proxy01.merit.edu (merit-proxy01.merit.edu [207.75.116.193]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3717121F8AD2 for <armd@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by merit-proxy01.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940CD203984C for <armd@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:01:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit-proxy01.merit.edu
Received: from merit-proxy01.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (merit-proxy01.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3laDceNh8P63 for <armd@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:01:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.255.255.5] (sfpop-vpn01.merit.edu [192.203.195.134]) by merit-proxy01.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C235203984A for <armd@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:01:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Manish Karir <mkarir@merit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:01:52 -0400
Message-Id: <905C201F-E6DD-4FA2-A65A-38472BA39571@merit.edu>
To: armd@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: [armd] datacenter reference architecture draft
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:02:04 -0000

The following draft was submitted to hopefully help focus the ARMD discussion around a common architecture.

Comments and feedback are welcome.  The goal of the writeup really is to abstract away specific datacenter designs
each of which focuses on solving a particular application/traffic pattern by trying to talk about what is common between 
the various designs.  Hopefully this will help some of the very varied discussion that has taken place in this WG so far.

Thanks.
-manish

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-armd-datacenter-reference-arch-01.txt
-----------------------------------------
Filename:	 draft-karir-armd-datacenter-reference-arch
Revision:	 00
Title:		 Data Center Reference Architectures
Creation date:	 2011-10-24
WG ID:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 11

Abstract:
  The continued growth of large-scale data centers has resulted in a
  wide range of architectures and designs.  Each design is tuned to
  address the challenges and requirements of the specific applications
  and workload that the data is being built for.  Each design evolves
  as engineering solutions are developed to workaround limitations of
  existing protocols, hardware, as well as software implementations.

  The goal of this document is to characterize this problem space in
  detail in order to better understand if there is any gap in making
  address resolution scale in various network designs for data
  centers.  In particular it is our goal to peel back the various
  optimization and engineering solutions to develop generalized
  reference architectures for a data center.  We also discuss the
  various factors that influence design choices in developing various
  data center designs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------