[arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name

Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com> Thu, 26 August 2010 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ldunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: arp222@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arp222@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A70E3A6994 for <arp222@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbqLUUOFQ0Wo for <arp222@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4073A6843 for <arp222@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.4.101]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L7R00958NT29N@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for arp222@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:46:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from L735042 ([10.124.12.75]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L7R00BMBNSW8D@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for arp222@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:46:08 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:46:03 -0500
From: Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com>
To: arp222@ietf.org
Message-id: <004201cb4535$cd451130$4b0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_NJUKCbca9Ho7cuwk/Twqvg)"
Thread-index: ActFNcoOlonQryKGTsKJPvIV7C/iVQ==
Subject: [arp222] Considering to change ARP222 name
X-BeenThere: arp222@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <arp222.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222>, <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arp222>
List-Post: <mailto:arp222@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arp222>, <mailto:arp222-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:45:53 -0000

It has been pointed to us by several people that the name ARP222 is a little
misleading. The main objective is to resolve issues associated with Address
Resolution for Massive amount of VMs or virtual hosts/Nodes in one broadcast
Domain. 

 

What do you think if we change the name to ARMD or ARMND? 

 

Your opinion is appreciated. 

 

Linda Dunbar