Re: [art] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-appsawg-mdn-3798bis-15: (with COMMENT)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE411126BF7; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 23:26:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8B6mhg8G2Of; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 23:26:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34F51294E0; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 23:26:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mbp-4.local ([IPv6:2601:647:4201:9e61:74b9:1e46:8869:d0e]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uB17QXxu059169 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 07:26:34 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host [IPv6:2601:647:4201:9e61:74b9:1e46:8869:d0e] claimed to be mbp-4.local
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <148045984479.11658.9871297229137288131.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKrAFKUpaXUvyRNrRvef4HwuWqPi3pFKMWoQMdxoyGurQ@mail.gmail.com> <E02B3AD6-D005-4574-BEE6-77B913017CF5@nostrum.com> <45734A55-BF3F-4407-BC7B-FEF0F81E69CE@nostrum.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <faa72a35-9453-02e8-02c3-24edf02b45b1@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 23:26:31 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <45734A55-BF3F-4407-BC7B-FEF0F81E69CE@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Of0cI2LXFJpm00OXSRENuICEsubC6foOW"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/2PdS32ViRij3fwXaTGwBcPq56QU>
Cc: "appsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, art@ietf.org, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-appsawg-mdn-3798bis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [art] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-appsawg-mdn-3798bis-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:26:40 -0000

On 11/29/16 3:47 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2016, at 17:43, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
>> On 29 Nov 2016, at 17:40, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>
>>>> Should the Media-Type registration go to the authors of the draft, as
>>>> specified, or instead to the appsawg & eventually defaulting to the
>>>> IESG?
>>>
>>> We're inconsistent about whether we do or don't like having individual
>>> contributors as contact points for these things.  I'm one of those who
>>> don't like it, preferring a (relatively speaking) stable address over
>>> an individual who may change jobs (and thus change email addresses),
>>> leave IETF work, retire, die, whatever.
>>>
>>> For my part, I'd prefer to stop using individuals as contact points
>>> for registrations that come from working groups or areas, and always
>>> use a working-group or area mailing list.
>>
>> I agree with Barry in general, though I don't have a strong opinion
>> one way or another for this particular document.
>
> Oops, I meant to go on to say that I prefer not to use mailing lists
> that don't already have some reason to live mostly forever--At least
> without making it clear that the contact may change over time.
speaking as the one-time culler of mailing lists. we used to have quite
a few that  had zero traffic for years, I don't thing there's much more
assurance that an official mailing list is manned then an email address.

joel
> _______________________________________________
> art mailing list
> art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art
>