IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-appsawg-mdn-3798bis-15: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 29 November 2016 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A97C1295B4; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:43:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R4YLnevv_pER; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC3412952D; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uATNhkfk084049 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:43:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:43:46 -0600
Message-ID: <E02B3AD6-D005-4574-BEE6-77B913017CF5@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKrAFKUpaXUvyRNrRvef4HwuWqPi3pFKMWoQMdxoyGurQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148045984479.11658.9871297229137288131.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKrAFKUpaXUvyRNrRvef4HwuWqPi3pFKMWoQMdxoyGurQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5310)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/jj-TNc8n4_1F9MuMR2BdnvTm6p0>
Cc: "appsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, art@ietf.org, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-appsawg-mdn-3798bis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [art] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-appsawg-mdn-3798bis-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:43:51 -0000

On 29 Nov 2016, at 17:40, Barry Leiba wrote:

>> Should the Media-Type registration go to the authors of the draft, as
>> specified, or instead to the appsawg & eventually defaulting to the 
>> IESG?
>
> We're inconsistent about whether we do or don't like having individual
> contributors as contact points for these things.  I'm one of those who
> don't like it, preferring a (relatively speaking) stable address over
> an individual who may change jobs (and thus change email addresses),
> leave IETF work, retire, die, whatever.
>
> For my part, I'd prefer to stop using individuals as contact points
> for registrations that come from working groups or areas, and always
> use a working-group or area mailing list.

I agree with Barry in general, though I don't have a strong opinion one 
way or another for this particular document.

Alexey, thoughts?

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email