Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05

James <james.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 10 October 2022 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <james.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9409EC152596; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lXIVP4zEAXCG; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FEE5C1524DC; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id i12so7708221qvs.2; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DLArpE/d25V61GyLI5ar1lXq+FO2cO0N8dOXLWp4GB4=; b=aBQ3kSKiqwlBHX1+cM7eKRonMFfFUp28L92xPB8R6weIsYbDQnl5kBnLw1NcKYwfIj 4tQtOtenbjZEYOVu6LVfkEmM7N+StZI2GpKuK/NV4BKbp0HzDisWAJLiAberQigrqt80 5YKgYn+VWjIPc0IIQ4CU+oxSCZTcgSMIKrTsaKUzYEmabzeTuTUmuLBl3PdzLf2ckq4a thgeWxJaEeXr5Ya2Y7M0wJIk5if5JgLWUM4Yydn/oOKIpjDuImq489grxJtNQMMml/b9 P7mPsLnsICg6M+8eI4kCf3TIX7qrWoM0CYCBpTFkfJRpX0TXjC/rbZzhj5/mkrkmbeRS CsSA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DLArpE/d25V61GyLI5ar1lXq+FO2cO0N8dOXLWp4GB4=; b=tALLnLzXVC78ks8GczfzeMVHuPQInDa8YPZ1GOgwWNJDLUKT4gyvQS5g02PYLOM9Wh s8G4rai3qfEiGBsbLORi5lsibd4hcWdcO9z228IYkNZBYFjFj2F+J2B62TdMQTKz1rYf SbprzgIEowiUI7eaPccDDWoqHgjX6wx37F9OOxryNfh2nMbqhq7u6WGsQ2baQmGAHWGZ KRyde5QjCc6Pa2boEMFrkdAxdXaWJ2rJKfBQlvaV8DKl85ee4eWh92FtcxIw2yP1KR3S 3MeFLMPIom8wi+dsVbj7Dzx/n9m/HG4mPt4TNgQFoYVqCSGzeV1tM1RtMC4qpaRhSk4X ySaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2+TuFTZa/tvZDQYmdXKLoUk/F9XVDnfQWZJAtnoV7tAxSgU1Wb 8fZo3ZGRCT1Dl+i5YeuhCkI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5xR0z8YMx8F0K9y1OZNyh5jlU0JXYGzqGMaNJzz+bV76eai2PB/yLXlo+A9irjJGjszZNUOA==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9001:0:b0:4af:8c5a:511f with SMTP id o1-20020a0c9001000000b004af8c5a511fmr15956278qvo.61.1665430201409; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (2a02-a468-ca02-1-a0d5-53d7-1683-4a6f.fixed6.kpn.net. [2a02:a468:ca02:1:a0d5:53d7:1683:4a6f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bn13-20020a05622a1dcd00b0039492d503cdsm8950633qtb.51.2022.10.10.12.30.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: James <james.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQkCYWW2cTWtUETimzEPwAuJDZ5sJ6Cm_Kzf5=vN-6Rhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 21:29:58 +0200
Cc: art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-quic-v2.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, quic@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2E525024-E780-4CF3-B93A-4E9414CB1E7D@gmail.com>
References: <166532658238.48475.17013440760168260317@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAM4esxQkCYWW2cTWtUETimzEPwAuJDZ5sJ6Cm_Kzf5=vN-6Rhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/88DCk1IW1Wzn6GfIQeVN5oB7dO4>
Subject: Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 19:30:04 -0000

Martin,

Thanks for clarifying, and no I'm not going to insist.

~ J

> On 10 Oct 2022, at 20:58, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> James,
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> 
> I honestly don't think it's a big deal either way -- I'll add either normative word if you insist, but I don't think a requirement is necessary here and it flows a bit better this way in my opinion. "ignore" is obviously a pretty loose word to use -- it would certainly be OK for a client to log it or something.
> 
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 7:43 AM James Gruessing via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: James Gruessing
> Review result: Ready
> 
> This is my review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05 as part of ART Last Call review.
> 
> Overall this is a well written document that is clear in its writing, and I
> have only one minor point of clarification.
> 
> Section 4.1 - "The client ignores Retry packets using other versions." - is
> this supposed to be a normative phrase, i.e. "The client SHOULD/MUST ignore
> Retry packets"? This sentence feels out of place in a paragraph with normative
> text defining other requirements. Or is this a behaviour defined in VN that I
> have missed?
> 
>