IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Mon, 10 October 2022 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4103BC1526EB; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87IrRoiv5ZJI; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 659B4C152719; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id z18so7699699qvn.6; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kMVapKBGJXZehfiQoGz5KQyV60ny6wyumA9Yqowj85M=; b=Vn0qgFF7HO8nUW80QGgyM9/0eEXRuVJ8LHllUhvavGsW2NlAWXSLiCWoXar8nzMG6D cN7Q+fKZhljcn2IGRQZIKE9K0GGiG/GdNFr66j76XRTVyc4ZBT77nQgbd9E2fq5N3lLg WhAax3zmEFcAENjKm8lyRA84w8cCQG/tpiHruWbxehBUnkGYoVxnE8NxLq8z933DIEoJ 1em9SWwBHq2+cDLNRSNyGRUJ9b+5+pY+X0PFPs1WiYm6AFZX5D7ZeTduvattv3w9Byj+ MvrIn9mJcron73TANCn8XMSpaZu61+ZizyF7vNkVfxYzSXRKjoAlNS5nAFWfR9SxAumY 8A7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=kMVapKBGJXZehfiQoGz5KQyV60ny6wyumA9Yqowj85M=; b=IL8CpPjX1X53kYGc7ciBSVwoH5DU81uaU2tlvDlJOOoDVSLRxTALru7gKmdQ/TlpJx NAr/kExq9VhAYN0IDaFF+s2i/QnSDyTT+IaTHJhX1uhuKiCElfP4RqyN4WV6TARm2tCJ 57iE2U6gSC2bfpQ+ANaPEpRnPtkdX0eARbauF6aNeZyEteMjcvOat2h9ko5c2VL+BpiL wUAT2clZYSDoL1bYQSY4BRK/kbvj/qamS9FsU3pizhBBB0apD8D9bY+HH/N+iGZNsQXZ 6bu83X/RpKo2UpBqKxp5wMtY/OFdAW41XAc78qWKVpPAJ7K6CuDLoASua6oB3CyQ4T9D aG1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1UpCtnTo6pKdcnETygecjuWOiyFYXtqN8Gu8v3tSaARlCdxf6L cyG5Eb5yKXEOToweFyhCN+sRVZtHBOHoonbF0IP9aWd/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7FxyKpUowedkjieGLALVGTLxZHZ3mYCkhnCSQP+SvYyXRFcxbD7e/ZgfKWNqtaZUbX/QFD/Waf+GU3U9gHe/E=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:ab53:0:b0:4b3:f1be:b9f6 with SMTP id i19-20020a0cab53000000b004b3f1beb9f6mr7821703qvb.52.1665430261518; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166532658238.48475.17013440760168260317@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAM4esxQkCYWW2cTWtUETimzEPwAuJDZ5sJ6Cm_Kzf5=vN-6Rhg@mail.gmail.com> <2E525024-E780-4CF3-B93A-4E9414CB1E7D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2E525024-E780-4CF3-B93A-4E9414CB1E7D@gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:30:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRp36o+ZQjJZceALZExu+SHSCb7kXpqHrA2a6UTasDxUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: James <james.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-quic-v2.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, quic@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000022d5d805eab3333d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/MJyuZe-eFlqiu9r1o-VeRUdFRHA>
Subject: Re: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 19:32:14 -0000

Thanks!

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:30 PM James <james.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Martin,
>
> Thanks for clarifying, and no I'm not going to insist.
>
> ~ J
>
> > On 10 Oct 2022, at 20:58, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > James,
> >
> > Thanks for the review!
> >
> > I honestly don't think it's a big deal either way -- I'll add either
> normative word if you insist, but I don't think a requirement is necessary
> here and it flows a bit better this way in my opinion. "ignore" is
> obviously a pretty loose word to use -- it would certainly be OK for a
> client to log it or something.
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 7:43 AM James Gruessing via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> > Reviewer: James Gruessing
> > Review result: Ready
> >
> > This is my review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05 as part of ART Last Call
> review.
> >
> > Overall this is a well written document that is clear in its writing,
> and I
> > have only one minor point of clarification.
> >
> > Section 4.1 - "The client ignores Retry packets using other versions." -
> is
> > this supposed to be a normative phrase, i.e. "The client SHOULD/MUST
> ignore
> > Retry packets"? This sentence feels out of place in a paragraph with
> normative
> > text defining other requirements. Or is this a behaviour defined in VN
> that I
> > have missed?
> >
> >
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email