IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6895)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Fri, 25 March 2022 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EFA3A0BD3 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OdmAji4x_ENn for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066C33A080B for <art@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC02A425C194; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxyExPNTKnxb; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B640425A344; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220325190002.A18F03BAA5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:21:33 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <409C3E7D-AD56-497C-8866-7A01F5B99422@amsl.com>
References: <20220325190002.A18F03BAA5@rfc-editor.org>
To: standards@taugh.com, mx0dot@yahoo.com, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, art@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/9wsPKL7f8AxNbMork1p1fIWbC4w>
Subject: Re: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6895)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 21:21:38 -0000

Greetings,

FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Mar 25, 2022, at 12:00 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7505,
> "A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6895
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Jesus Alvarado <mannyman4208@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 7505
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 8.1 firmware oh and I forgot that I do have a couple of admin breaking part to recover.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> I have 3 different ones that I can re encode in to but haven’t got a to do paperwork from Symantec contracts from 2015 that worked through 2012 problems from 2013.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 13 std ters.. of Trojans layers still knowing how to work through and did part of the clean forge come back
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7505 (draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail
> Publication Date    : June 2015
> Author(s)           : J. Levine, M. Delany
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : ART Area General Application Working Group
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email