[art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6895)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 25 March 2022 19:00 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F5F3A17C4 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RYGSQXKz9FmU for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1CF73A17A8 for <art@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id A18F03BAA5; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: standards@taugh.com, mx0dot@yahoo.com, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, superuser@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mannyman4208@gmail.com, art@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220325190002.A18F03BAA5@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:00:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/GHN761zTby4IKBu0sOYnbrcQcZ0>
Subject: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6895)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:00:10 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7505, "A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6895 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jesus Alvarado <mannyman4208@gmail.com> Section: 7505 Original Text ------------- 8.1 firmware oh and I forgot that I do have a couple of admin breaking part to recover. Corrected Text -------------- I have 3 different ones that I can re encode in to but haven’t got a to do paperwork from Symantec contracts from 2015 that worked through 2012 problems from 2013. Notes ----- 13 std ters.. of Trojans layers still knowing how to work through and did part of the clean forge come back Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7505 (draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10) -------------------------------------- Title : A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail Publication Date : June 2015 Author(s) : J. Levine, M. Delany Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : ART Area General Application Working Group Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6895) RFC Errata System
- Re: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (68… Chris Smiley
- Re: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (68… John C Klensin