Re: [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techniques for stopping robocalling
Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Sat, 17 March 2018 21:09 UTC
Return-Path: <hgs10@columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A40A124D37 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvVXaPM911yT for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outprodmail02.cc.columbia.edu (outprodmail02.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.72.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6199C12D870 for <art@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hazelnut (hazelnut.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.213.250]) by outprodmail02.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w2HL96m0036478 for <art@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:09:06 -0400
Received: from hazelnut (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hazelnut (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF7E8D for <art@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sendprodmail04.cc.columbia.edu (sendprodmail04.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.72.16]) by hazelnut (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B098E for <art@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-f199.google.com (mail-ot0-f199.google.com [74.125.82.199]) by sendprodmail04.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w2HL93b8000781 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <art@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:09:03 -0400
Received: by mail-ot0-f199.google.com with SMTP id g107-v6so681509otg.20 for <art@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EK3VI1Baqa/TLBsb2D6VZMwpe+P3iQwlLWpJppeeakY=; b=RQaYgJReRiJ5S7zMzlHhiU5h86OIfrmGHNWgrAd2U2M/KhHabTMrE1CzNFPCRzIYYx NIjjS24DKV8HNy4SeTQH/H20eqiy/5o2RprZZWyF7w7elcJMpR5FnxtKH8cHO18kjZr5 F4ImWGHc8HzUl+itB32N4SLpfjni/oCSB6tUnskssGsAd1KEXK6j/QJb5n8TwAE0hOGO UfpoELuks2oYa+Uf3M4MdLpwVttB0HFlwM2GX/zp4s7CgOAHnyzT8HvsZrCFoD9zRMJ/ g906SrmCPsg5h5HBxaIQHR1cGbnYSLYaVQtu3afGhvg2linVZ1BFBkiFc/QoTcaO9tKS vD7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7F90SMUx9uPTG6MeFYiRgJPiWWq9ZY4YQtZbxc8ulRClhBRc6YB 5pOJxrCqmTQp6EcGaFeYBa/LKyF+naaPYvNUqyiJJ6wBBGqFC5EEPtNl58ZLkNDTQNumbmV25fI 5x51cbIPt04vJIBSZfcy6o7JmbW8=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3364:: with SMTP id u33-v6mr4643498otd.26.1521320942712; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELshRvA2fPKaMEcdFrDnrSCQfRkg4luxXNtQ/xIJEMlj/pAcOz2HSZwoIQWlKCX1nEFlUxoH0XqX0xxX/6zl3Qw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3364:: with SMTP id u33-v6mr4643480otd.26.1521320942376; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:b72:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1760564F-45CC-4EE2-869A-76EDB434694A@wordtothewise.com>
References: <CA+23+fFxLXt8v-TF=vyn-AptHHMJfJC14jh315z3CJF-AYGf_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDtEhti-HTsY3K_KMU0r3ReNh5M0Xnt9XMMk9AXPfMWew@mail.gmail.com> <1760564F-45CC-4EE2-869A-76EDB434694A@wordtothewise.com>
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:08:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CACgrgBbHoSGBg=WPBMftsR8r0BZp3ocZhMrSf9+D7g18aakUXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Atkins <steve@wordtothewise.com>
Cc: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>, stir@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c2e7c0567a222ae"
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 128.59.72.16
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Ovi2aAV4iudHI0XStgDm3ICIiLw>
Subject: Re: [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techniques for stopping robocalling
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 21:09:11 -0000
I admit that I'm less than thrilled with having VoIP add to global warming. Is that really what we want to accomplish, just as other blockchain-like systems are getting, rightfully, dinged for that? We have to consider that the most likely parties affected will be legitimate mass callers, e.g., for emergency notifications or appointment reminders, increasing their costs for no particularly good reason. As long as this isn't universal, the bad guys will simply avoid such destinations. (They don't seem to be focusing on the PBX market anyway - they may suspect that corporate offices are not promising target markets for cruise deals and credit repair pitches.) Henning On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Steve Atkins <steve@wordtothewise.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 17, 2018, at 10:58 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Jonathan, Cullen, > > > > I was somewhat surprised that the draft did not have a direct reference > to the SIP Hashcash work (especially since Cullen was the author of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jennings-sip-hashcash-06). From my > perspective at least, it still looks to be a useful historical antecedent > to consult, since it is a proof-of-work system (and one on which a bunch of > later cryptocurrencies draw). In particular, its view that this is about a > demonstration of work rather than a payment to send may still be a valuable > perspective. > > > > http://www.hashcash.org/ still appears to be up, by the way, for folks > that want to see how its original use case tied into thwarting denial of > service attacks. > > I hope someone is soliciting input from the email community, who went > through this process a decade or so ago and noted that bad actors have > much, much cheaper access to CPU for proof-of-work than good actors do. > > Cheers, > Steve > _______________________________________________ > art mailing list > art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art >
- [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techniques… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techni… Ted Hardie
- Re: [art] [stir] Thursday lunch discussion on new… Jonathan Nelson
- Re: [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techni… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techni… Steve Atkins
- Re: [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techni… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techni… John Levine
- Re: [art] [stir] Thursday lunch discussion on new… Richard Shockey
- Re: [art] Thursday lunch discussion on new techni… Ned Freed