IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7601 (5435)

Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com> Tue, 24 July 2018 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <poccil14@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0211310F6 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hrv_279dw5ze for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064E91310F9 for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j68-v6so1408520ywg.1 for <art@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:mime-version:to:cc:from:subject:date:importance :in-reply-to:references; bh=66RpjA4+Mtj/QDQ1wTy2O5sL0fSH9lzr31GYyD2Fmwg=; b=iVNF0bAyeD8A47yLPjx3jSP0KEcJp8hh64oRm+f4ipaeF+c7lckGgx6UOoFXtQZshF 9fpai6SA87udROxLQzC99tnwoUEDozYEwuoXkvU8PbI5AGgaPdfejF8KTe98vaM0EVmf mGWpu9atYUTEiglEVoT8B1QXsjKfBGo3PklPENX+vJU9INcRx4KY3bjeXNZQO8kN/Eci lvhhJ766zgCNn8/s3aKwoWqrZCq3kqqGESDEGbSoEfKvDo99qxgv5TeVMes05D0EkcrY MAGusflqk2+iXFZzo6ScWmeJRK9JauQq+Pixs/2Z/I0pV0RwUAmfhj+Dw5jWyb7+XMtL DA9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:mime-version:to:cc:from:subject:date :importance:in-reply-to:references; bh=66RpjA4+Mtj/QDQ1wTy2O5sL0fSH9lzr31GYyD2Fmwg=; b=ca/lphLikCfjS+qdx2j/T3hoHUf28M9gou0p0qtTZMG9B1Bd+S/s4oMZloaf8Fa8AY RQv4q9u/A+NRPUbWxNAqEI73Q1MN2raOW6CjVUbqS25h+j3CPuj/kmMurC81QVr+Vfjz bX7OqA0qOJbFCiKVb8gnPfjE6oKNLTpiaUIZoXRqlh39XdSwqj+lTE2oj9gP0J18oEyZ 9O2yapX2r6giH8jrv80gpLoRzcRQdGqZzMVaWyGv5qluxGs12ckq/5OBa1aKGDRJIvUu WGtJZqsBRmgZu/lntFftsoMAJbrtKjAwZeBwM9lboBDt3Zy9SXhELMp8LdBy+eShHUky lXEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGz4P9jU5YH+bf1W6FEdIDRyM1ws8m9cBuibFMMVO1BVxMVZbxX sytRJgify2BaqNw8R+u1Fj4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfKfKPQTJ6VQR9Jz2CjfNGf5Xr1UvDH8bEN992GD9KmX5SifmzuEF6gbxS8ZIe1AudTlCKcQw==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:9f8f:: with SMTP id w137-v6mr8491840ywg.157.1532433255133; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:192:4e00:596:22:8b71:4eb9:6006? ([2601:192:4e00:596:22:8b71:4eb9:6006]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o128-v6sm213708ywe.110.2018.07.24.04.54.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5b571366.1c69fb81.96f7c.11c7@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: "ben@nostrum.com" <ben@nostrum.com>, "adam@nostrum.com" <adam@nostrum.com>, "aamelnikov@fastmail.fm" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "superuser@gmail.com" <superuser@gmail.com>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
From: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:54:17 -0400
Importance: normal
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <87lga1pdg2.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
References: <20180723000558.CD758B80F99@rfc-editor.org> <87lga1pdg2.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_AA774AF7-0F78-4291-9263-16759BD70AB8_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/PueGW86GmivwU_gYQrRofeZmDH4>
Subject: Re: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7601 (5435)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:54:18 -0000

On further thought, it is indeed incorrect.  Therefore, the errata submission is withdrawn.

--Peter


From: Dale R. Worley
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 10:36 PM
To: RFC Errata System
Cc: poccil14@gmail.com; ben@nostrum.com; adam@nostrum.com; aamelnikov@fastmail.fm; art@ietf.org; superuser@gmail.com; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7601 (5435)

I think that the erratum is, strictly speaking, incorrect.  I've not
worked through examples in detail, but you can see that each propspec
contains exactly one "=" (other than in certain quoted contexts), which
makes it unlikely that two successive propspecs could be parsed as a
single propspec.  If there really is an ambiguity, the way to
demonstrate it is to provide an example.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status