Re: [art] BCP190

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187C312003E for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pL7taDPPAQU7 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A72212001E for <art@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9c35.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9c35.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.156.53]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x6N3vhab076852 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:57:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1563854265; bh=Buz8uPY8PDHehiK4vtpyygiR54PTDvzEAEqkBy9aZFk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ZNDAb3JYGIkCBHviNn1xcQgVwBDowyMDDHipg+NpuqZR9VUuM7MC8QQsGUAJqxS94 j2tYhsxHPdZkvWVFUaPR8vM5/wnao5cPAgo0E3OTo/ENsPSXjdYvZUERcGMcBTNuaT j3RVd4eXGKsST11XkFwxtK1CdZPbgcKliWQci6rQ=
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, art@ietf.org
References: <422255D5-FD8A-48D8-8442-1A13E3E7B884@tzi.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <8872cc5c-34c5-845c-c930-3a7f0e3501f2@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:57:42 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <422255D5-FD8A-48D8-8442-1A13E3E7B884@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/ZP-YUe0ZjPvsutB7foOQ5rxf4x4>
Subject: Re: [art] BCP190
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:57:49 -0000

On 7/22/19 19:15, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> BCP190 is out of scope for protocols that define an entire web server.


Without weighing in on whether this statement is something I agree with, 
I want to point out that it isn't applicable to the topic at hand: 
discussions in TRANS have specifically referred to the origins that CT 
logs are hosted on as "multi-tenant."

/a