Re: [art] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6867)

Harish Bahadur dhami,

Could you explain, for those of us unfamiliar with your name and
how it should be rendered in English and Latin characters, the
conventions that apply?  As far as I can tell from the errata
report, you reported the issue as "Harish Bahadur dhami".  That
is what the document says already.  But you say it should be
corrected to "Harish bhadur dhami"?

Is the inclusion of a "a" in the second lexical word/token in
you name incorrect?  If so, do you need help in correcting your
datatracker login as well as fixing this (not an RFC Editor
problem)?  Should the name be written with the first letter in
"Harish" in upper case but the first letters of the next two
lexical tokens in lower case?  Or with the first letters of the
first and second, but not the third in upper case?  Or something
else?  And, again, because we would like to get these things
right for you and others in the future, could you please take
time to explain the convention?

thanks,

--On Saturday, March 5, 2022 00:57 -0800 RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7505,
> "A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That
> Accept No Mail".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6867
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Harish Bahadur dhami <harishdhami389@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 2119
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Harish Bahadur dhami
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Harish bhadur dhami
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Harish Bahadur dhami
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary,
> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be
> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the
> verifying party   can log in to change the status and edit the
> report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7505 (draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record
> for Domains That Accept No Mail Publication Date    : June 2015
> Author(s)           : J. Levine, M. Delany
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : ART Area General Application Working
> Group Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> art mailing list
> art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art