[art] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6867)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 05 March 2022 08:57 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62A03A10DF for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 00:57:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0D_KI7O4GdD3 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 00:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D683A10D7 for <art@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 00:57:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 450BD3BA94; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 00:57:11 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: harishdhami389@gmail.com, standards@taugh.com, mx0dot@yahoo.com, art@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220305085711.450BD3BA94@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 00:57:11 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/uRejKNZH4OvRnDnSP0wrzuAVCXo>
Subject: [art] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6867)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 08:57:18 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7505, "A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6867 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Harish Bahadur dhami <harishdhami389@gmail.com> Section: 2119 Original Text ------------- Harish Bahadur dhami Corrected Text -------------- Harish bhadur dhami Notes ----- Harish Bahadur dhami Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7505 (draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10) -------------------------------------- Title : A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail Publication Date : June 2015 Author(s) : J. Levine, M. Delany Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : ART Area General Application Working Group Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [art] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7505 (6867) RFC Errata System
- Re: [art] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7505 (68… John C Klensin
- Re: [art] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7505 (68… Chris Smiley