Re: [Asap] Call for WG adoption: draft-engi-siptrunkingcapability-link (was Re: Update: Draft for link relation type

["Derek Engi (deengi)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

We have made some minor changes to this document based on the feedback we received from Marc. We are planning to submit the updated version of the draft once the I-D submission tool opens back up in the next few days.

Thanks,
Derek

--
Derek Engi
[e-mail]


From: Asap <[e-mail]> on behalf of Marc Petit-Huguenin <[e-mail]>
Date: Sunday, July 3, 2022 at 9:24 AM
To: A. Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Asap] Call for WG adoption: draft-engi-siptrunkingcapability-link (was Re: Update: Draft for link relation type
I reviewed this document, and support its adoption.

On 6/22/22 16:21, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since there were no comments received, either for or against, the chairs can't call consensus on adopting this as a WG document.
>
> The deadline has been extended -- please provide feedback by July 8th.
>
> Thanks!
> Jean
>
>
> On 6/16/22 8:49 AM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The mailing list hasn't seen any comments on this document so far. Are there any objections? Anyone have feedback?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jean
>>
>> On 6/1/22 6:26 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As discussed at IETF 111 and confirmed on list [1], the WG was in favor of defining and registering a link relation type.
>>>
>>> Please provide feedback on whether this document should be adopted by the working group by June 17th.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Jean, as co-chair
>>>
>>> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asap/fA48N343wIQGjpoaDkbQcEO0_QY/
>>>
>>> On 5/20/22 12:17 AM, Kaustubh Inamdar wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> A  draft that defines a new link relation type - namely ‘sipTrunkingCapabilities’,  has been uploaded and can be found at the following URL:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-engi-siptrunkingcapability-link <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-engi-siptrunkingcapability-link>
>>>>
>>>> The primary reason for defining a new relation type in the context of ASAP is to ensure provisions for a service discovery mechanism are made. A service discover mechanism (leveraging the new link relation type and webFinger) lends the sip auto peer framework better to automation - from discovering the capability server to provisioning the enterprise edge element.
>>>>
>>>> Any comments or observations on the link relation draft are welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kaustubh
>>>>
>>>>> On 10-Feb-2022, at 12:26 PM, Sreekanth Narayanan (sreenara) <sreenara=[e-mail] <mailto:sreenara=[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> Just wanted to provide an update on the ASAP effort to the larger group. We are currently working on the second draft that defines a link relation type for the capabilitySet in order to complete the discovery approach with WebFinger in the ASAP configuration workflow. The first version of this draft should be ready in a couple of weeks from now. We will send a follow-up email notifying the group regarding publication.
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sreekanth
>>>>> --
>>>>> Asap mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asap <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asap>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


--
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: [e-mail]
Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug