[Asap] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-asap-siptrunkingcapability-link-03: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-asap-siptrunkingcapability-link-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-asap-siptrunkingcapability-link/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thanks for this short document.

>From reading this document, it wasn't clear to me as to what the exact
relationship is between this document and I-D.ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer. 
Specifically, is I-D.ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer just an example of what might be
found using 'sip-trunking-capability' or is it the only capability document
that would expect to be found at that location?  Based on the answer to this
question, it might be helpful for the text in section 4 to be more proscriptive
of the relationship, and perhaps check that the text is section 1 and 2 also
describes this clearly.

In terms of document process, I was slightly surprised to see:
(a) this as Informational rather than Standards Track - I guess that
Informational is sufficient, but Standards Track may have been clearer to a
reader; (b) that ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer is only an informative reference
rather than a normative reference (which goes back to my original question
above); (c) this as a separate document to ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer, which also
goes back to my original question above.

Regards,
Rob