Re: [Asap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-09.txt

Kaustubh Inamdar <kaustubh.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 08 December 2023 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <kaustubh.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EA9C14F686 for <asap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 03:44:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7wbCz5PFD4Au for <asap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 03:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B12C14F5FA for <asap@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 03:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6cb55001124so1298815b3a.0 for <asap@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Dec 2023 03:44:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1702035888; x=1702640688; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=w1aH1sudhHIFVofGU3rjZVRPWDvi00t0Kw37ycqaFrc=; b=X3NFPpo8FT33voocBOfQhl/FVRFMvP24zcR61fImOiImMP8bjmumnHhhIBZu3FGx3H fG1Cna+th+f4q1sdEQKlqJhFpnyr3Loxe0tBdbWMiXfCrLVP17QlmtyM2nNucrWI6Meq 6GHLPRNPNKsym4JziVTw3j3foV+KxnWRhkYM6zr6w+9HjG7xkAr+nGs0zXeLesoMTOtA HvJ2m54MPHPQWXwKLR/fEzAp6KV+RPzUwUnOtWds5qKsC/7lsyvxUPq9bpeDcQ3a3Owg lq9y6jgmtfh5LoxjEV2pQvfqguL8Qq8c+uwoig/wQc3qqXPC4ov7xsU+wdRfvb4GIs9K irqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702035888; x=1702640688; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=w1aH1sudhHIFVofGU3rjZVRPWDvi00t0Kw37ycqaFrc=; b=C3vapxL8I6lTrXU5CBUhmwFy9jneMel7TqJ24iZfeX8qh9rB7CiZ6Jpkh4BM1l6W8X vc8hRf0IrMR74d4+g+z/JiaVAQJzWdFVdpUgwg/eP3JoEf9cjQvV4k8CvXw2zQuLh3hp euYdNuw5DTK6nRf7QTvFhi6KuW/C+xiacUUpoEe5uUfVmplsZJgaXcE82TaN//NNPbj9 ZLoIQJRBhRawketsSqkItbgwnYM1/TmNIAhrsT98LN7AV1Jsg8J0Z7YwqdiXkY4R9qcv oZyhhJrXfw/j4Xhx3DmhVLfR1oUASEkcxqhyYXh1NbNGVWzLF1TjgJqoJ0l2IippXX0B MOww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy/fRB7qLVUxMtEgFl45I6f9l9DoAnH68FJKRqbmbRSNCS5xy7I EedxQBpBOknAGIC7LPTUIdbijZRxXHfuAA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEsQVPIaYvmJWkEzMBX9SyRZxJT8jLDyS2Do1HhsgiH7IQ5XCS31wYo42YncdV0/GF5csZNYg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:394b:b0:18f:97c:384d with SMTP id r11-20020a056a20394b00b0018f097c384dmr946938pzg.39.1702035887637; Fri, 08 Dec 2023 03:44:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([49.207.233.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2-20020a63df02000000b005c60ad6c4absm1387366pgg.4.2023.12.08.03.44.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Dec 2023 03:44:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Kaustubh Inamdar <kaustubh.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3CC0AA8D-8B99-4F0C-8DDD-D2EE0AD89D18@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F48CBAEF-69B0-40DC-91F9-79A9635CF52D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 17:14:44 +0530
In-Reply-To: <NkEPiZy--3-9@tutanota.com>
Cc: Asap <asap@ietf.org>
To: Nicola Serafini <n.serafini=40tutanota.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <NkEPiZy--3-9@tutanota.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asap/VP_V9M21I25JDm9UAOCp8nhzSps>
Subject: Re: [Asap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-09.txt
X-BeenThere: asap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automatic SIP trunking And Peering WG <asap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asap>, <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asap/>
List-Post: <mailto:asap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asap>, <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 11:44:52 -0000

Hi Nicola,
Thank you for your suggestions, I agree that references to RFC 7231 is incorrect. Our intention was to specify and enforce the usage of HTTPS or HTTP over TLS. We will make the required modifications in an upcoming version of the draft that will be published shortly.

Thanks,
Kaustubh
> On 27-Nov-2023, at 11:55 AM, Nicola Serafini <n.serafini=40tutanota.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi everybody, first of all,  many thanks for your work.
> 
> While reading the draft, I may noticed some typos regarding the HTTP protocol, all of those typos I identified use HTTPS instead of HTTP; a week ago I emailed Authors and I have not received any response so far.
> 
> An example of typo that I also referenced in my previous email is Section "2.1. Reference Architecture":
> 2.1.  Reference Architecture
> 
>    Figure 1 illustrates a reference architecture that may be deployed to
>    support the mechanism described in this document.  The enterprise
>    network consists of a SIP-PBX, media endpoints (M.E.) and a Session
>    Border Controller [RFC7092].  It may also include additional
>    components such as application servers for voicemail, recording, fax
>    etc.  At a high level, the service provider consists of a SIP
>    signaling entity (SP-SSE), a media entity for handling media streams
>    of calls setup by the SP-SSE and a HTTPS [RFC7231] server.
> 
> As you can see here, I think "HTTPS [RFC7231]" is typo for three main reasons:
> 
>     1 - RFC7231 defines HTTP protocol.
>     2 - RFC7231 was obsoleted by RFC9110 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110>).
>     3 - RFC9110 also obsoletes RFC2818 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2818 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2818>).
> 
> Another example is:
>    Taking the above considerations into account, this document proposes
>    a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)-based workflow using which the
>    enterprise network can solicit and ultimately obtain the service
>    provider capability set.  The enterprise network creates a well
>    formed HTTPS GET request to solicit the service provider capability
>    set.  Subsequently, the HTTPS response from the SIP service provider
>    includes the capability set.  The capability set is encoded in JSON,
>    thus ensuring that the response can be easily parsed by automation.
> 
> Where I believe you mean: "[...] The enterprise network creates a well formed HTTP GET request [...]".
> 
> Finally, I agree with you that you may want to suggest the use of HTTP over TLS for this architecture.
> 
> Am I wrong with this concerns/suggestions?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Nicola
> -- 
> Asap mailing list
> Asap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asap