Re: [Asap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-09.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 18 April 2024 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: asap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC5BC14F6F0 for <asap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wp-VCcr8UZKq for <asap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94F51C14F6E1 for <asap@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a554cf23c3eso4645166b.2 for <asap@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713462165; x=1714066965; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rBz8KiOocKq8zlHaact8HBdtuWtPORBceiOGACKuxdc=; b=dNOtKa8qy4o3dVK9fD4BR8TQdqzwt+D2AogFeUTi2j1IchUtb2m+BdpTyAdECy0hYu Y4kW8OnFCdaCgHjplc8BC8aN50v9hdtUY5s+hjHb7FfyWpoIX4OZR6DSiCxnXQeg9Fq4 Iqs00mAy9ATMjJldTRC4xvlJilE5gZH0+xiljn/xvLlFneWQryD/oc1o3PVFcBDc8PBa LMWHsLyZc5s/8RTgS4f3mZGq6XRKTRBnguhOPwXE/all9mreQmH8zThRN/n212e+sSIi MdnZw0vdFZvHEGSnn7dAQzVOOHz1UEPyI7AiuRISS6Cp+DiBdeG5Qy4s2JcZzfTYeBZm p5lg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713462165; x=1714066965; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=rBz8KiOocKq8zlHaact8HBdtuWtPORBceiOGACKuxdc=; b=bCEGt/xaegEwnLnRDOqTT2J0Z6c6YPwBx0pCbxeAPqvTUWkUowuLYEL4xNV4lTvy9w YMMbawPtiU8ibG/9CJJLvBrQo8jBIwgOSXi2YUUPwwmo8M7svUbfYP8X9CF5m2U9ygJ/ J7ldzhP1GPPAaJLctKFIW+nC72jGwgY14O3Ag85ao0kY4LDPsyngFAnmCTMCFtNe/4B1 a0pe9aNkg11T9ZdCJ11/dBtenuDFX04pBpRJsFKpQU+7pAn/ergRFQxMmW+19qcHfm/d Lf6aQOAbPL/6jx3tUY8NcivHMn8RrOBOzDuPX16iovtw7+RWKlG+5bESWksP+bsXjLM+ 6HBA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVR7Hw7jZInzcw5PO6sKIOLyPblmiwoCGJW+BUKlDgCnoRoyluqsZ1tuiM99mrVXhssZ+fnVesG+l4hrBfM
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxQfmmrIToH0N7lVm5ujwnO1a/frZFy2tLI+D+cckQxK7sATfpF ZRzofNF+bGlbBR/YRiILsb3WNPvuQ79Py0d3t2iiyxbf73I7J5CCYNmlut2HFXB/z64zajOx9Yc EnL+KoataCqWgWuKmCO/3Sz/kNr3lGA0t
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEPy3stUHEsCoH27X6g0jGb1M2I2C7ncIQQEsbRRg8iEaTa1gC0nFqpzjIczeOs4OWnDcZvdqprllGZoxQV9gk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cd0f:b0:a55:144a:adc2 with SMTP id oz15-20020a170906cd0f00b00a55144aadc2mr1816911ejb.6.1713462164567; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <NkEPiZy--3-9@tutanota.com> <3CC0AA8D-8B99-4F0C-8DDD-D2EE0AD89D18@gmail.com> <CH3PR11MB8185C6918A65133B5E42BE58DD92A@CH3PR11MB8185.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH3PR11MB8185C6918A65133B5E42BE58DD92A@CH3PR11MB8185.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:42:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb_X55CcUA_tSFL-PsLJKjHB+mLPFrMnAvnGaU=43aQqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sreekanth Narayanan (sreenara)" <sreenara=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Nicola Serafini <n.serafini=40tutanota.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Asap <asap@ietf.org>, Kaustubh Inamdar <kaustubh.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a7bda50616627f10"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asap/kg4h575-GRH4ZnwzOJopgnk1rTU>
Subject: Re: [Asap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-09.txt
X-BeenThere: asap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automatic SIP trunking And Peering WG <asap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asap>, <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asap/>
List-Post: <mailto:asap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asap>, <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 17:42:52 -0000

Hi all,

It looks like this document has been in WGLC since December.

Is it ready to go to Publication Requested?

-MSK

On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 8:44 AM Sreekanth Narayanan (sreenara) <sreenara=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi Nicola,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your feedback! We’ve incorporated your suggestions and
> published the latest version of the draft (draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-11)
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Sreekanth
>
>
>
> *From:* Asap <asap-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Kaustubh Inamdar
> *Sent:* Friday, December 8, 2023 5:15 PM
> *To:* Nicola Serafini <n.serafini=40tutanota.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc:* Asap <asap@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Asap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-09.txt
>
>
>
> Hi Nicola,
>
> Thank you for your suggestions, I agree that references to RFC 7231 is
> incorrect. Our intention was to specify and enforce the usage of HTTPS or
> HTTP over TLS. We will make the required modifications in an upcoming
> version of the draft that will be published shortly.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kaustubh
>
> On 27-Nov-2023, at 11:55 AM, Nicola Serafini <
> n.serafini=40tutanota.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi everybody, first of all,  many thanks for your work.
>
>
>
> While reading the draft, I may noticed some typos regarding the HTTP
> protocol, all of those typos I identified use HTTPS instead of HTTP; a week
> ago I emailed Authors and I have not received any response so far.
>
>
>
> An example of typo that I also referenced in my previous email is Section
> "2.1. Reference Architecture":
>
> 2.1.  Reference Architecture
>
>
>
>    Figure 1 illustrates a reference architecture that may be deployed to
>
>    support the mechanism described in this document.  The enterprise
>
>    network consists of a SIP-PBX, media endpoints (M.E.) and a Session
>
>    Border Controller [RFC7092].  It may also include additional
>
>    components such as application servers for voicemail, recording, fax
>
>    etc.  At a high level, the service provider consists of a SIP
>
>    signaling entity (SP-SSE), a media entity for handling media streams
>
>    of calls setup by the SP-SSE and a HTTPS [RFC7231] server.
>
>
>
> As you can see here, I think "HTTPS [RFC7231]" is typo for three main
> reasons:
>
>
>
>     1 - RFC7231 defines HTTP protocol.
>
>     2 - RFC7231 was obsoleted by RFC9110 (
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110).
>
>     3 - RFC9110 also obsoletes RFC2818 (
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2818).
>
>
>
> Another example is:
>
>    Taking the above considerations into account, this document proposes
>
>    a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)-based workflow using which the
>
>    enterprise network can solicit and ultimately obtain the service
>
>    provider capability set.  The enterprise network creates a well
>
>    formed HTTPS GET request to solicit the service provider capability
>
>    set.  Subsequently, the HTTPS response from the SIP service provider
>
>    includes the capability set.  The capability set is encoded in JSON,
>
>    thus ensuring that the response can be easily parsed by automation.
>
>
>
> Where I believe you mean: "[...] The enterprise network creates a well
> formed HTTP GET request [...]".
>
>
>
> Finally, I agree with you that you may want to suggest the use of HTTP
> over TLS for this architecture.
>
>
>
> Am I wrong with this concerns/suggestions?
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> --
>
> Nicola
>
> --
> Asap mailing list
> Asap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asap
>
>
> --
> Asap mailing list
> Asap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asap
>