Re: [Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-asdf-00-02: (with COMMENT)

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

Hi Éric,

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Looking forward to seeing this WG in action !

Thank you!

> Some comments though:
> 
> "the Semantic Definition Format (SDF) was created" should a reference to SDF be
> added ? Then, later, it seems that SDF specification is the key work item for
> ASDF WG.

The reference would be to draft-onedm-t2trg-sdf, which was a bit too ephemeral to include here, but we certainly could (we could also reference the github repo where that was developed, https://github.com/one-data-model/SDF ).

> "Some 200 models in SDF format have been contributed " a reference to the
> repository would be welcome. Should "in 2020" be added to provide more context ?

Sounds good to me (even if 2020 isn’t quite over yet).

> "they look to the IETF for developing SDF 1.0 further into a high-quality
> specification" is positive for the IETF but this claim has no reference.

There are several liaison statements of organization contributing to the OneDM process (see IETF108 slides), but OneDM itself is not really an organization that is making statements.  Maybe we can find something to reference if needed.

> Expanding "WISHI" would help the non-expert reader (like myself).

Good point.
Work on IoT Semantic/Hypermedia Interoperability
http://wishi.space
(We need to update that page and make it https…)

Grüße, Carsten