[Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-asdf-00-02: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 05 October 2020 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: asdf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF653A0E2D; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 01:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: asdf-chairs@ietf.org, asdf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160188581276.21683.15447401704086809302@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:16:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asdf/TPxlSSJqB_ps65SDO_H3WrEP1I0>
Subject: [Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-asdf-00-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "A Semantic Description Format \(SDF\) for Things and their Interactions and Data" <asdf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/>
List-Post: <mailto:asdf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:16:53 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-asdf-00-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-asdf/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Looking forward to seeing this WG in action !

Some comments though:

"the Semantic Definition Format (SDF) was created" should a reference to SDF be
added ? Then, later, it seems that SDF specification is the key work item for
ASDF WG.

"Some 200 models in SDF format have been contributed " a reference to the
repository would be welcome. Should "in 2020" be added to provide more context ?

"they look to the IETF for developing SDF 1.0 further into a high-quality
specification" is positive for the IETF but this claim has no reference.

Expanding "WISHI" would help the non-expert reader (like myself).