[Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-asdf-00-02: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 05 October 2020 08:16 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: asdf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF653A0E2D; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 01:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: asdf-chairs@ietf.org, asdf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160188581276.21683.15447401704086809302@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:16:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asdf/TPxlSSJqB_ps65SDO_H3WrEP1I0>
Subject: [Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-asdf-00-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "A Semantic Description Format \(SDF\) for Things and their Interactions and Data" <asdf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/>
List-Post: <mailto:asdf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 08:16:53 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-asdf-00-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-asdf/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Looking forward to seeing this WG in action ! Some comments though: "the Semantic Definition Format (SDF) was created" should a reference to SDF be added ? Then, later, it seems that SDF specification is the key work item for ASDF WG. "Some 200 models in SDF format have been contributed " a reference to the repository would be welcome. Should "in 2020" be added to provide more context ? "they look to the IETF for developing SDF 1.0 further into a high-quality specification" is positive for the IETF but this claim has no reference. Expanding "WISHI" would help the non-expert reader (like myself).
- [Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Asdf] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-… Barry Leiba