Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 19 May 2004 19:58 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA09507 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 15:58:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQWs5-00018O-TC for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 15:37:03 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4JJavMJ004353 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 15:36:57 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQWQI-0004kr-79 for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 15:08:14 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA02510 for <asrg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 15:08:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQWQF-0003NH-6N for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 15:08:11 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQWPA-00039u-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 15:07:04 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQWOC-0002xL-00 for asrg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 15:06:04 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQVoW-0006iB-KD; Wed, 19 May 2004 14:29:12 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BQTo3-00065m-Uy for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 12:20:36 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA21078 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 May 2004 12:20:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BQTo2-0001he-9C for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 12:20:34 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BQTme-0001bw-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 12:19:08 -0400
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk ([193.201.200.170] ident=mail) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BQTm2-0001Wn-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 12:18:30 -0400
Received: by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with local id 1BQTlw-0007Nc-00; Wed, 19 May 2004 17:18:24 +0100
To: richard@highwayman.com
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis
In-Reply-To: <j8075egWYyqAFA8T@highwayman.com>
References: <LV1hjGBSmTqAFAry@highwayman.com> <CB27C1AA-A8AB-11D8-B336-000393863768@chromatix.demon.co.uk> <mevaB4e60fqAFAu2@highwayman.com> <03A0F711-A929-11D8-B336-000393863768@chromatix.demon.co.uk> <03A0F711-A929-11D8-B336-000393863768@chromatix.demon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <E1BQTlw-0007Nc-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 17:18:24 +0100
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com> wrote: > >Goodman & Rounthwaite have an interesting paper on using Captchas to >limit webmail usage (one conclusion is that you need quite a number of >them). It was presented at EC'04 yesterday, but the link on Joshua's >home page is not currently working -- I expect he'll fix it when he gets >home :( > http://research.microsoft.com/~joshuago/ Do they address the captcha-solving porn surfers attack? http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/23.17.html#subj4 Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ FITZROY: VARIABLE 3 OR LESS IN SOUTH, OTHERWISE NORTHEASTERLY 3 OR 4, OCCASIONALLY 5. FAIR. MODERATE WITH FOG PATCHES. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Richard Clayton
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis der Mouse
- RE: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Jonathan Morton
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Richard Clayton
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Jonathan Morton
- RE: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis grsa
- RE: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Bill Cole
- Don't blame the list, blame me (was RE: [Asrg] 3.… Bill Cole
- RE: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Bill Cole
- [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Richard Clayton
- [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Tony Finch
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Jonathan Morton
- Re: [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Philip Miller
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Mark Baugher
- [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis Richard Clayton
- Re: [Asrg] Re: 3. About hashcash v1 (was: Proof-o… Jonathan Morton
- [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Adam Back
- Re: [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis william(at)elan.net
- Re: [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Richard Clayton
- Re: [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis Richard Clayton
- Re: [Asrg] Re: 3. Proof-of-work analysis william(at)elan.net