IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Development of an object assessment format/protocol

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 04 March 2013 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C63121F85DF for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:07:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gwuv2jB5feUH for <asrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203E221F8648 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r24H6vnL018293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:06:58 -0800
Message-ID: <5134D4AF.8060101@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:06:55 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <20130304132924.GA27928@gsp.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130304132924.GA27928@gsp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Development of an object assessment format/protocol
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:07:23 -0000

On 3/4/2013 5:29 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> We need, I think, a mechanism via which we can ask more complex questions
> and get more comprehensive answers.  We need a mechanism which isn't
> a hack on top of DNS, but which has been developed from the ground up
> specifically for this purpose.


By way of exploring a baseline, how does what you are asking for differ 
from the Repute work:


    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/repute/charter/

Can it be a value-add enhancement to it? If not, why?

d/
-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email