IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] UCEPROTECT's comment on draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]

Al Iverson <aiverson@spamresource.com> Tue, 01 March 2011 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <aiverson@spamresource.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1687C3A692E for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:15:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.178
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.178 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cW5kbQa8tgoC for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154C43A6912 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so6344079wwb.19 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 08:16:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.71.13 with SMTP id q13mr6251483wed.21.1298996219205; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 08:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.183.139 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:16:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <08098715-2DA4-46A3-8AF4-CCB2A73FA848@cauce.org>
References: <AANLkTimHpKzxNLKAabNTQbQNFiAK7EwoeUa9kqF96+ow@mail.gmail.com> <20110227190039.0FD6B12EC69@ca-mirror-1.uceprotect.net> <AANLkTimh_=k9=gKmWbDq2Yj_E=4gegNgME9=nZSQvJ+n@mail.gmail.com> <20110228003938.48F9B12EC69@ca-mirror-1.uceprotect.net> <A.1PuA1G-000DCv-BL@smtp-ext-layer.spamhaus.org> <4D6C1456.4030101@nortel.com> <20110228222001.6A4C512EC69@ca-mirror-1.uceprotect.net> <4D6C297A.10701@fahq2.com> <08098715-2DA4-46A3-8AF4-CCB2A73FA848@cauce.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:16:59 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=FNba=i2fcKZVLBWxNC_1dTd1NHcKt2phYx_0V@mail.gmail.com>
From: Al Iverson <aiverson@spamresource.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Asrg] UCEPROTECT's comment on draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:15:58 -0000

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Neil Schwartzman <neil@cauce.org> wrote:

> Interesting. So the CEO basically allows the staff to run rampant, go 'on strike' (one supposes they will not be paid for this period of time), deface the corporate website with ill-advised text, and they haven't been fired en masse?
>
> Seems to me any CEO worth his salt would have done that right off the bat, and taken down that page. I sure as hell would not have dared pull a stunt like this at any place I've worked. I'd go so far as to say I deeply distrust the veracity as this has been presented by Claus.

I have to agree -- I don't think Claus is being honest about this.
Something doesn't smell right and I'm about ready to set up a procmail
filter to address it. I'm really disappointed by UCEPROTECT's churlish
response.

Regards,
Al Iverson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email