Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]

Matt Sergeant <msergeant@messagelabs.com> Tue, 01 March 2011 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <msergeant@messagelabs.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3883A681D for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEJI+2yyh3Uc for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail33.messagelabs.com (mail33.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1413A6943 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:29:00 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: msergeant@messagelabs.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-33.messagelabs.com!1298996998!35321167!8
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=messagelabs.com,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [95.131.111.138]
Received: (qmail 6002 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 16:30:01 -0000
Received: from mlbrn2exc001.messagelabs.com (HELO mlbrn2exc001.messagelabs.com) (95.131.111.138) by server-6.tower-33.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 16:30:01 -0000
Received: from smtp-out.devel.messagelabs.com ([10.191.110.53]) by mlbrn2exc001.messagelabs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:29:13 +0000
Received: (qmail 1159 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 16:28:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Valour.local) (10.7.253.21) by matt?dev.int.star.co.uk with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 16:28:56 -0000
Message-ID: <4D6D1EC7.6080508@messagelabs.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:28:55 -0500
From: Matt Sergeant <msergeant@messagelabs.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 1.1.5 (Macintosh/20100613)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <EE315DEA-7486-4673-9875-DEC91352BC55@cauce.org>
In-Reply-To: <EE315DEA-7486-4673-9875-DEC91352BC55@cauce.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040408090704030005010509"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2011 16:29:13.0999 (UTC) FILETIME=[CD5181F0:01CBD82D]
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:29:02 -0000

Neil Schwartzman wrote:
> <aol>  +1, and agreed. Heck, I may have even been the person to suggest this clause, some years ago at the IRTF meeting when the ASRG was resurrected. Charging for delisting is just plain bad business.
The original wording was designed to cover this, it said (and jeez, this 
was back in 2003!): " If all things listed in your criteria for listing 
are cleared up then there should be no reason to not remove the IP 
address. No /extra/ rules for de-listing.". We simply made it more 
explicit (and better English).

Matt.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________