IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07

Graeme Fowler <graeme@graemef.net> Tue, 01 March 2011 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <graeme@graemef.net>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0E33A69CF for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 01:15:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZkE2a4ueLQb for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 01:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boom.graemef.net (boom.graemef.net [82.113.154.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D73D3A692A for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 01:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squonk.lut.ac.uk ([131.231.87.200]) by boom.graemef.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <graeme@graemef.net>) id 1PuLgy-0001VC-Bi for asrg@irtf.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:16:29 +0000
From: Graeme Fowler <graeme@graemef.net>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110301014303.GA2536@gsp.org>
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <4D6C3FFA.6050407@jdmc.org> <4D6C4B90.1090300@FahQ2.com> <20110301014303.GA2536@gsp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:16:25 +0000
Message-ID: <1298970985.5587.0.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:15:28 -0000

On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 20:43 -0500, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> I'm in favor of the BCP with its current wording.  Not that I completely
> agree with every last bit of it, but I think it's an awfully good first
> stake-in-the-ground, and that we should plant it, take a deep breath,
> then start thinking and debating about what the second stake should
> look like.

It's not often I have agreed with RSK word for word :) but I agree with
that.

Graeme (representing the vastly smaller end of the scale)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email