Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]

Seth <sethb@panix.com> Tue, 01 March 2011 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sethb@panix.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8954A3A6A8C for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:39:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FPY0+EWoVFEi for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2043A69CC for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361D51F092 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:40:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: by panix5.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 756) id 1EAAC24200; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:40:22 -0500 (EST)
From: Seth <sethb@panix.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-reply-to: <4D6D4A49.2090107@messagelabs.com> (message from Matt Sergeant on Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:34:33 -0500)
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <EE315DEA-7486-4673-9875-DEC91352BC55@cauce.org> <4D6D4284.50102@thoroquel.org> <AANLkTinxGLpeWmxGWR7hiLoZabYhhmfQdAh=JagCg2yk@mail.gmail.com> <4D6D4A49.2090107@messagelabs.com>
Message-Id: <20110301204022.1EAAC24200@panix5.panix.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:40:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:39:19 -0000

Matt Sergeant <msergeant@messagelabs.com> wrote:
> Esa Laitinen wrote:
>> There is potential for conflict of interest here, though: what if the 
>> consumer of the data (i.e. paying customer) is also involved in spamming?
> If they want to pay me to run a blocklist which lists them... go right 
> ahead :)

I trust you, personally, to do the right thing; however, I recognize
that a conflict of interest *exists*.

Seth