Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07

"Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)" <skull@bofhland.org> Tue, 01 March 2011 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <skull@bofhland.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6CA3A69AD for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:35:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxDr9LPhZAwW for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:35:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mithrandir.bofhland.org (mithrandir.bofhland.org [IPv6:2a02:9a8:94::b]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED253A6969 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:35:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zarathustra.local (zarathustra.spin.it [IPv6:2a02:9a8:1:100::ff3c]) by mithrandir.bofhland.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50B2660044 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:36:27 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4D6CB005.8040609@bofhland.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:36:21 +0100
From: "Emanuele Balla (aka Skull)" <skull@bofhland.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <4D6C3FFA.6050407@jdmc.org> <4D6C4B90.1090300@FahQ2.com> <20110301014303.GA2536@gsp.org> <4D6C6254.3080903@thoroquel.org> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103010829560.24437@Kozue.int.eridani.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103010829560.24437@Kozue.int.eridani.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 08:35:30 -0000

On 3/1/11 9:30 AM, Michael McConnell wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Joe Sniderman wrote:
> 
>> On 02/28/2011 08:43 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm in favor of the BCP with its current wording.  Not that I completely
>>> agree with every last bit of it, but I think it's an awfully good first
>>> stake-in-the-ground, and that we should plant it, take a deep breath,
>>> then start thinking and debating about what the second stake should
>>> look like.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> While I'm not 100% pleased with the current wording of the conflict of
>> interest section, it is close enough IMHO. Count me in favor of the BCP
>> (with its current text) as well.
> 
> +1.

Add me too.

-- 
Paranoia is a disease unto itself. And may I add: the person standing
next to you may not be who they appear to be, so take precaution.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bofhskull.wordpress.com/