IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]

Seth <sethb@panix.com> Tue, 01 March 2011 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sethb@panix.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF043A6AF4 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:12:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.857
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.857 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PED0-Ba48AWE for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5060E3A6AD2 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448F11F082 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:13:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: by panix5.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 756) id 31F0924200; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:13:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Seth <sethb@panix.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-reply-to: <A.1PuWl4-000NJL-4x@smtp-ext-layer.spamhaus.org> (message from Steve Linford on Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:05:26 +0000)
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <EE315DEA-7486-4673-9875-DEC91352BC55@cauce.org> <4D6D4284.50102@thoroquel.org> <AANLkTinxGLpeWmxGWR7hiLoZabYhhmfQdAh=JagCg2yk@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimzi+__J8dwVYPZ4td9ZLc_15r-kEgG2jOpg6cJ@mail.gmail.com> <20110301203843.E812124200@panix5.panix.com> <A.1PuWl4-000NJL-4x@smtp-ext-layer.spamhaus.org>
Message-Id: <20110301221305.31F0924200@panix5.panix.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:13:05 -0500
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:12:02 -0000

Steve Linford <linford@spamhaus.org> wrote:

> You could help bolster your scenario by using as example some
> criminal botnet gangs as the DNSBL customers,

The key point was later: If you have any customers, for anything, then
you have a potential conflict of interest when a (potential) customer
wants something that conflicts with what you would otherwise do.

If a spammer offers you $1 million to give a concert at Carnegie Hall
if you don't list him, then you have a conflict of interest.  There's
no charge for usage, listing, delisting, or anything else related to
the DNSBL involved.

Seth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email