Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]

[Bill Cole <[e-mail]>]

On 1 Mar 2011, at 11:28, Matt Sergeant wrote:

> Neil Schwartzman wrote:
>> <aol>  +1, and agreed. Heck, I may have even been the person to 
>> suggest this clause, some years ago at the IRTF meeting when the ASRG 
>> was resurrected. Charging for delisting is just plain bad business.
> The original wording was designed to cover this, it said (and jeez, 
> this was back in 2003!): " If all things listed in your criteria for 
> listing are cleared up then there should be no reason to not remove 
> the IP address. No /extra/ rules for de-listing.". We simply made it 
> more explicit (and better English).

That bit (2.2.4) is properly distinct from the CoI/payment bit (2.2.5) 
because there can be both inherent and prudent forms of 
hysteresis/asymmetry between listing criteria and delisting criteria.