Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]

Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> Wed, 02 March 2011 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <trelane@trelane.net>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC4E3A6C13 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:56:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdkwztohOsYM for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.trelane.net (mail.trelane.net [66.93.203.104]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50E43A6B5D for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B08F1864B4 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:57:29 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at trelane.net
Received: from mail.trelane.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (master.trelane.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxfKOG6OHIW5 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:57:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D790A1864B8 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:57:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [172.16.1.106] (unknown [66.93.203.199]) by mail.trelane.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D2D41864B4 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:57:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4D6DCE35.4070106@trelane.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:57:25 -0500
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <EE315DEA-7486-4673-9875-DEC91352BC55@cauce.org> <4D6D4284.50102@thoroquel.org> <AANLkTinxGLpeWmxGWR7hiLoZabYhhmfQdAh=JagCg2yk@mail.gmail.com> <4D6D4B64.5070304@mines-paristech.fr> <4D6D4EF6.8030601@trelane.net> <4D6D5713.3080205@mines-paristech.fr> <20110301215047.A6B3624200@panix5.panix.com> <4D6D6E00.4020507@mines-paristech.fr> <4D6DBA08.1070607@nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D6DBA08.1070607@nortel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 04:56:27 -0000

On 3/1/2011 10:31 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
> On 3/1/2011 5:06 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
>
>> If one consider that spammers money is dirty money (criminal activity
>> as one said)... and if part of
>> the DNSBL revenue comes from this dirty money, how do you name this ?
>> Probably not "money laundry",
>> but surely not something legal.
>
> While this particular horse isn't particularly relevant (if not dead),
> there are a variety of illegal things it could be, depending on the
> circumstances.  The key is whether the DNSBL operator can be shown to
> have _known_ that the delist request corresponded to ongoing illegal
> activity.  If it can, it could be accessory, conspiracy, racketeering
> or other things.
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> Asrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
Those who are not lawyers should not practice law.  In fact, this is
another failing of this section of the draft.

Andrew