IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Tue, 01 March 2011 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949D93A6CD3 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:42:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ro8zRl-wTKIG for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961BB3A6C4C for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squonk.gsp.org (bltmd-207.114.25.232.dsl.charm.net [207.114.25.232]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p211h9CH009725 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:43:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from avatar.gsp.org (avatar.gsp.org [192.168.0.11]) by squonk.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p211kHnv016354 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:46:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from avatar.gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p211h30l002650 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:43:03 -0500
Received: (from rsk@localhost) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p211h3Yb002649 for asrg@irtf.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:43:03 -0500
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:43:03 -0500
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <20110301014303.GA2536@gsp.org>
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <4D6C3FFA.6050407@jdmc.org> <4D6C4B90.1090300@FahQ2.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D6C4B90.1090300@FahQ2.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:42:10 -0000

I'm in favor of the BCP with its current wording.  Not that I completely
agree with every last bit of it, but I think it's an awfully good first
stake-in-the-ground, and that we should plant it, take a deep breath,
then start thinking and debating about what the second stake should
look like.

---rsk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email