IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07

Joe Sniderman <joseph.sniderman@thoroquel.org> Tue, 01 March 2011 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <joseph.sniderman@thoroquel.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ECE3A6D80 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:04:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LFgRyJ+hVRP9 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.thoroquel.org (mail.thoroquel.org [72.14.190.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7028D3A6D7E for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.174] (cpe-75-185-9-222.columbus.res.rr.com [75.185.9.222]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.thoroquel.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p2134s1X012600 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 03:04:55 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thoroquel.org; s=thoroquel2a; t=1298948695; bh=1BPTi9PsLB/lslKXpmom0JL+FlcqhcEU4ue0MoGKHG0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:CC:DomainKey-Signature; b=TNfeja4Rrx8UKuDm3fWphnbNPaThI+0lvcyEh5jGPDvu1LXMMvl2+TDnuS6lW+WmO hRevlwevSX2GpkjnGvnxK55/tKhMvPZbA7fbSyaEPFaSAr8r80dDuQx5atvyjUYeq3 qA2YRys58qce8lTgc4g+33bGaGaVDWReCQ8R/xxg2btlvhkibI8XuqptH2qbB/k7W6 aWV8UuyoHcuvwQaghs5SqPpkPL9BDSfqf+JXVL3gER2k67RKw1ZsRIDUt+txPJNtcu ZuSm6pJHzmLXiM6RpvHii6098rDT2cK7PgQRNLIo1Wund1YstJkvDappmRAticOdgK Oc9lCw9loG7KQ==
Message-ID: <4D6C6254.3080903@thoroquel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:04:52 -0500
From: Joe Sniderman <joseph.sniderman@thoroquel.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <4D6C3FFA.6050407@jdmc.org> <4D6C4B90.1090300@FahQ2.com> <20110301014303.GA2536@gsp.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110301014303.GA2536@gsp.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: id=605721CA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 03:04:02 -0000

On 02/28/2011 08:43 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> 
> I'm in favor of the BCP with its current wording.  Not that I completely
> agree with every last bit of it, but I think it's an awfully good first
> stake-in-the-ground, and that we should plant it, take a deep breath,
> then start thinking and debating about what the second stake should
> look like.

+1

While I'm not 100% pleased with the current wording of the conflict of
interest section, it is close enough IMHO. Count me in favor of the BCP
(with its current text) as well.

-- 
Joe Sniderman <joseph.sniderman@thoroquel.org>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email