IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]

"Chris Lewis" <clewis@nortel.com> Wed, 02 March 2011 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <CLEWIS@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1793A6A21 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:30:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.614
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.614 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJU080d2SXZY for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C1F3A6A16 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 19:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id p223VMm07725 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 03:31:23 GMT
Received: from zrtphx5h0.corp.nortel.com ([47.140.202.65]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:31:22 -0500
Received: from [47.9.28.250] (47.9.28.250) by zrtphx5h0.corp.nortel.com (47.140.202.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.340.0; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:31:22 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6DBA08.1070607@nortel.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:31:20 -0500
From: Chris Lewis <clewis@nortel.com>
Organization: Nortel
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: asrg@irtf.org
References: <4D6C265E.1060101@averillpark.net> <EE315DEA-7486-4673-9875-DEC91352BC55@cauce.org> <4D6D4284.50102@thoroquel.org> <AANLkTinxGLpeWmxGWR7hiLoZabYhhmfQdAh=JagCg2yk@mail.gmail.com> <4D6D4B64.5070304@mines-paristech.fr> <4D6D4EF6.8030601@trelane.net> <4D6D5713.3080205@mines-paristech.fr> <20110301215047.A6B3624200@panix5.panix.com> <4D6D6E00.4020507@mines-paristech.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4D6D6E00.4020507@mines-paristech.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2011 03:31:22.0820 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D8A8040:01CBD88A]
Subject: Re: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07 [re-send]
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:30:24 -0000

On 3/1/2011 5:06 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:

> If one consider that spammers money is dirty money (criminal activity as one said)... and if part of
> the DNSBL revenue comes from this dirty money, how do you name this ? Probably not "money laundry",
> but surely not something legal.

While this particular horse isn't particularly relevant (if not dead), 
there are a variety of illegal things it could be, depending on the 
circumstances.  The key is whether the DNSBL operator can be shown to 
have _known_ that the delist request corresponded to ongoing illegal 
activity.  If it can, it could be accessory, conspiracy, racketeering or 
other things.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email