Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9

Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> Tue, 17 June 2003 15:09 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA21551 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:09:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5HF97S04396 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:09:07 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5HF97m04393 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:09:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA21515; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SI2p-0000UT-00; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:06:47 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SI2o-0000UQ-00; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:06:46 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5HDa2a28363; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:36:02 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5HDZFm28333 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:35:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA14991 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:35:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SGa1-00070B-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:32:57 -0400
Received: from calcite.rhyolite.com ([192.188.61.3]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SGa0-000708-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:32:56 -0400
Received: (from vjs@localhost) by calcite.rhyolite.com (8.12.10.Beta0/8.12.10.Beta0) id h5HDZAMh013973 for asrg@ietf.org env-from <vjs>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:35:10 -0600 (MDT)
From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Message-Id: <200306171335.h5HDZAMh013973@calcite.rhyolite.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9
References: <E19SCFq-0003rQ-00@argon.connect.org.uk>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:35:10 -0600

> From: "Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com>

> ...
> I don't believe you can count on a "fine" ordering on a list like this.  

Yes, but it doesn't help when the messages are not received in
order by the exploder.  My guess is that order in 
https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/current/maillist.html
is close to the order of the flurry of messages as they were received
by Mailman.


Vernon Schryver    vjs@rhyolite.com
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg