Re: [Asrg] An "ideal" false positive (TMGRS take 2)

der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Sun, 14 February 2010 23:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mouse@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5271A28C15E for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:59:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.423, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLMr91tTH-3q for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:59:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG [216.46.5.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0452128C15C for <asrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:59:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mouse@localhost) by Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA21168; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:00:52 -0500 (EST)
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Message-Id: <201002150000.TAA21168@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway.
X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies.
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:59:51 -0500 (EST)
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100214235728.GA19491@gsp.org>
References: <4B61D1BA.6060807@tana.it> <20100129135607.GB27203@gsp.org> <FBFC96085D5112AA96E23D0F@lewes.staff.uscs.susx.ac.uk> <20100214224735.GB11546@gsp.org> <60F30C47-57A0-4D27-ACAD-3501666F8229@blighty.com> <20100214235728.GA19491@gsp.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] An "ideal" false positive (TMGRS take 2)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:59:26 -0000

>> You sent the email I'm replying to from an end user system, so
>> there's an innate paradox in that statement.
> Actually, no.  My email message is NOT an input to a security policy
> mechanism.

It is if people design security anything based on it.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B