Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu> Wed, 07 May 2003 09:07 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA21626 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:07:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h479Gpg28985 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:16:51 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h479Go828982 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:16:50 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA21608; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:07:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DKvb-0006lz-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 05:09:31 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DKva-0006lw-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 05:09:30 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h479FA828788; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:15:10 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h479Co828652 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:12:50 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA21460 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 May 2003 05:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DKrj-0006jq-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 07 May 2003 05:05:31 -0400
Received: from ocker.kanga.nu ([198.144.204.213] helo=dingo.home.kanga.nu) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DKri-0006jn-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Wed, 07 May 2003 05:05:30 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=kanga.nu) by dingo.home.kanga.nu with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19DKsT-0007Et-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 02:06:17 -0700
To: Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>
cc: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship
In-Reply-To: Message from Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de> of "Wed, 07 May 2003 10:29:54 +0200." <20030507082954.GA3038@danisch.de>
References: <20030507082954.GA3038@danisch.de>
X-face: ?<YUs-cNP1\Oc-H>^_yw@fA`CEX&}--=*&XqXbF-oePvxaT4(kyt\nwM9]{]N!>b^K}-Mb9 YH%saz^>nq5usBlD"s{(.h'_w|U^3ldUq7wVZz$`u>MB(-4$f\a6Eu8.e=Pf\
X-image-url: http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/kanga.face.tiff
X-url: http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
Message-ID: <27830.1052298377@kanga.nu>
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 02:06:17 -0700
On Wed, 7 May 2003 10:29:54 +0200 Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de> wrote: > <<< 550 5.7.1 REJECT go away: Sent to DCC > If you read the web page of DCC, then this is not based on certain > words contained in the message, but on checksums. In practice Vernon is more generous with his definitions regarding what gets matched and what gets reported than the DCC pages report. This is his perogative as a private mail system operator. > This particular message was reported to the DCC as being Spam. So > every customer of DCC will not receive that message anymore. There is not requirement for sites running DCC to use its as absolute spam markers. Most that I've seen use DCC as a hinting mechanism, one factor among several, not an absolute flag. > From my point of view this is private censorship and that's why I > don't like those systems. I do not think that censorship means what you think it does. Please check a good dictionary. What are you saying here? That someone should not elect what mail they are willing to receive or not? That someone should not state the criteria on which they decide what mail to receive or not? That someone should not state the actual decisions they made regarding mail they receive? That someone should not listen to the criteria or decisions another makes regarding their mail, and then factor that into their own mail policies in whatever manner they wish? There are slippery free speech issues in here. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship J C Lawrence
- Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship J C Lawrence
- Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship J C Lawrence
- Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship J C Lawrence
- RE: [Asrg] Content filter abuse for censorship Hallam-Baker, Phillip