Re: [Asrg] Point of information...

Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com> Fri, 20 June 2003 22:06 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA11579 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:06:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5KM63023866 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:06:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19TU1D-0006Cr-AT for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:06:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA11507; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:05:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19TU1A-0003ql-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:06:00 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19TU1A-0003qi-00; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:06:00 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19TU1A-0006Az-Qq; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:06:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19TU0C-0006AD-8b for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:05:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA11321 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19TU09-0003pq-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:04:57 -0400
Received: from 000-228-098.area5.spcsdns.net ([68.27.130.7] helo=68.27.130.7 ident=trilluser) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19TU07-0003pk-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:04:56 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030620180426.00ba88a0@solidmatrix.com>
X-Sender: research@solidmatrix.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
From: Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Point of information...
Cc: asrg@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-MimeHeaders-Plugin-Info: v2.03.00
X-GCMulti: 1
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:04:35 -0400

At 05:51 PM 6/20/2003 -0400, Barry Shein wrote:


>On June 20, 2003 at 11:20 research@solidmatrix.com (Yakov Shafranovich) wrote:
>  > >Now that viruses have emerged (Jeem, Proxy-Guzu, sobig.a) which can
>  > >make a computer (or, more to the point, millions of computers) an
>  > >unwitting weapon against the entire net this problem has to be taken
>  > >more seriously by Microsoft.
>  >
>  > Are any of these problems solvable by technical means? Going over and 
> over
>  > the illegality of spam does not help things, our group cannot make any
>  > legal impact anyway - we are working on technical solutions.
>
>Yes, replacing all MS windows operating systems on all computers
>attached to the net with either Unix or a modern unix-like operating
>system (Linux, Mac OSX) would eliminate about 99% of the spam and put
>virtually all spammers out of business instantly.
>
>That's not entirely practical, but it is technical and it would
>address the problem I am describing and responds to your
>concerns. Other technical approaches are possible. No, we're not
>finished, sorry...maybe Ritalin would help you.
>
>After nearly ten years of grappling with this for you to demand an
>instant problem definition and solution (or cease discussion) in one
>fell swoop seems almost willfully obstructionist.

Barry,

I am not demanding a definition or a solution. I would like to help to 
solve the problem just like everyone else. I do not think that anyone in 
here means bad, everyone means well. What I would like to see is more 
discussion of this topic from everyone including urself. Simply stating the 
facts and demanding a legal solutions does not help. I would like to see a 
technical discussion surrounding this approach and possible solutions.

Yakov  


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg