Re: [Asrg] Passive Spam Revocation

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Mon, 26 October 2009 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402F03A6801 for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HdVQvHLiJ0Il for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663183A687C for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squonk.gsp.org (bltmd-207.114.17.122.dsl.charm.net [207.114.17.122]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n9Q9i49e023272 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:44:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from avatar.gsp.org (avatar.gsp.org [192.168.0.11]) by squonk.gsp.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n9Q9fsTS014157 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:41:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from avatar.gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-4) with ESMTP id n9Q9hw2X000321 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:43:58 -0400
Received: (from rsk@localhost) by avatar.gsp.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9Q9hwmu000320 for asrg@irtf.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:43:58 -0400
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:43:58 -0400
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <20091026094358.GA32622@gsp.org>
References: <6679e0500910252145j69e51a6frb2cd90c86dff4bb4@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6679e0500910252145j69e51a6frb2cd90c86dff4bb4@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Passive Spam Revocation
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:43:54 -0000

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:45:12PM +0800, Yao Ziyuan wrote:
> The main idea is if a message is considered spam, this spam status
> can be tracked by the sender (but not sent to him directly, as the From
> field can be faked). 

Providing useful intelligence about (a particular site's) spam filters
to spammers is a seriously bad idea.

---Rsk