Re: ATM comes and goes

Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com> Fri, 17 May 1996 15:01 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15481; 17 May 96 11:01 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15475; 17 May 96 11:01 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08649; 17 May 96 11:01 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA29280; Fri, 17 May 1996 11:00:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA25001 for ip-atm-out; Fri, 17 May 1996 10:58:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA24992 for <ip-atm@nexen.com>; Fri, 17 May 1996 10:58:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lint.cisco.com (lint.cisco.com [171.68.223.44]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA29245 for <ip-atm@nexen.com>; Fri, 17 May 1996 10:57:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pferguso-pc.cisco.com (c1robo13.cisco.com [171.68.13.13]) by lint.cisco.com (8.6.10/CISCO.SERVER.1.1) with SMTP id HAA05166; Fri, 17 May 1996 07:58:24 -0700
Message-Id: <199605171458.HAA05166@lint.cisco.com>
X-Sender: pferguso@lint.cisco.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 10:57:43 -0400
To: Dharmesh Shah <dshah@nastg.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: ATM comes and goes
Cc: ip-atm@nexen.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ip-atm@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to ip-atm@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to majordomo@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives via http://cell-relay.indiana.edu/cell-relay/archives/IPATM/IPATM.html

At 09:45 AM 5/17/96 -0400, Dharmesh Shah wrote:

>IPATMers,
>
>My two cents worth of thought on this now dead thread...
>
>I have heard that the next killer-app for ATM will be the internet.  
>Sounds good.  This should include internet from home.  I would hope that 
>the telcos, the cablecos, the utilcos would provide me with access to the 
>internet via ATM on my PC.  This could be at flat-costs depending on the 
>MCR I ask for when subscribing to the service.  There are many bandwidth 
>mongers for whom NISDN is not enough (BTW, I still use a 2400 baud modem).  
>ATM could enable ISPs to provide very flexible data-rate vs. pricing 
>options.  Is this happening now?
>

No, at least not as purvasive as you mentioned. ATM is being used
by some backbone providers to increase their capacity. As other
more efficient technologies evolve, such as Packet over Sonet,
this may indeed change.

Will it happen? Who knows. With the IP-over-ATM cell tax and the
advent of gigabit-ethernet, ATM as we know (or envision) it
could be a thing of the past in the future.

My $.02, and certainly not representative of cisco Systems, Inc.

- paul

>Regards,
>
>DS
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Dharmesh D. Shah
>Computer Sciences Corporation
>(301) 794-4058
>
>email:
>dharmesh.shah@gsfc.nasa.gov
>dshah@cscmail.csc.com
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>

--
Paul Ferguson                                           ||        ||
Consulting Engineering                                  ||        ||
Reston, Virginia   USA                                 ||||      ||||
tel: +1.703.716.9538                               ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
e-mail: pferguso@cisco.com                         c i s c o S y s t e m s