IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ATM comes and goes

Albert Manfredi <manfredi@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com> Fri, 17 May 1996 15:28 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16138; 17 May 96 11:28 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16134; 17 May 96 11:28 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09301; 17 May 96 11:28 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA29730; Fri, 17 May 1996 11:28:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA25521 for ip-atm-out; Fri, 17 May 1996 11:23:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA25509 for <ip-atm@nexen.com>; Fri, 17 May 1996 11:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ENGR05 (engr05.comsys.rockwell.com [199.191.48.132]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA29640 for <ip-atm@nexen.com>; Fri, 17 May 1996 11:23:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by engr05.comsys.rockwell.com (UCX V4.0-10B, OpenVMS V6.1 VAX); Fri, 17 May 1996 11:19:56 -0400
Message-ID: <319CC3C9.647@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 11:22:01 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Albert Manfredi <manfredi@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com>
Organization: Rockwell Defense Electronics - Collins
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pferguso@cisco.com
CC: IP-ATM Working Group <ip-atm@nexen.com>
Subject: Re: ATM comes and goes
References: <md5:EFA858BF071A7B4D3817851F19295F57>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Orig-Sender: owner-ip-atm@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to ip-atm@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to majordomo@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives via http://cell-relay.indiana.edu/cell-relay/archives/IPATM/IPATM.html

> Will it happen? Who knows. With the IP-over-ATM cell tax and the
> advent of gigabit-ethernet, ATM as we know (or envision) it
> could be a thing of the past in the future.

Gigabit Ethernet might be a threat to ATM LANs. Then again, ATM in the
LAN was never such a super idea.

Bert
manfredi@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email