[Audit] Proposed charter change to clarify VCON relationship

[Jonathan Rosenberg <[e-mail]>]

I've opened a PR against the charter to revise the second deliverable, to
clarify the relationship with VCON explicitly:

https://github.com/mirjak/audit-bof-preparation/pull/61

Here is what I wrote:

One or more Standards Track RFC(s) that identify and reuse existing or
specify new IETF data models that can represent audit information about
agents and delegated systems (e.g., interaction records, references to the
identities of participating entities, delegation context, authorization
state over time, or action provenance). For interaction records - the
expectation is that the group will leverage the VCON format. Extensions to
VCON to add data needed to model AI agent conversations will happen within
the VCON group, and AUDIT will reference and (as needed) introduce profiles
or use cases for it. This applies in general - if existing data models are
identified the RFC(s) might create profiles that scope them to a degree of
disclosure that is appropriate for audits.


Thx,
Jonathan R.