Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9535 <draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-21> for your review

[Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]>]

Hi Glyn and Stefan,

Thank you for your approvals. We have noted them on the AUTH48 status page:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9535

Once we’ve received approval from Murray (AD), we will continue with the publication process.

Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Feb 15, 2024, at 4:30 AM, Stefan Gössner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Approved ...
> 
> Am 15.02.2024 um 00:36 schrieb Alanna Paloma:
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> Murray (AD) - Please see <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-ad-diff.html> to review and approve of the following changes:
>> -Section 1.1: added, deleted, and updated text
>> -Section 2.5.1.1: updated sourcecode
>> -Appendix A: updated sourcecode
>> 
>> Carsten - Thank you for the updated XML file. We have updated the files accordingly and noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9535
>> 
>> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535.xml
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535.txt
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535.html
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535.pdf
>> 
>> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff diff between last version and this)
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9535-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this)
>> 
>> Once we have received approvals from Stefan, Glyn, and Murray (AD), we will ask IANA to update their registry accordingly. After the IANA updates are complete, we will move forward with the publication process.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> RFC Editor/ap
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 14, 2024, at 1:01 PM, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Alanna,
>>> 
>>> On 2024-02-14, at 11:25, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> […]
>>>> I am collecting a few other changes in the XML at the repo now and included this change (“C4”, c8dfc85).
>>>> 
>>>> We’ll indicate when this updated XML is ready for consumption by the RPC.
>>>> 
>>> This is now complete at:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/blob/auth48/auth48/rfc9535.xml
>>> 
>>> The remaining changes are:
>>> 
>>> 9ad9249 * (C9) We now distinguish empty nodelists from Nothing
>>> 904cefb * (C8) Avoid superfluous "strict" in table 11, twice
>>> 5b6ac37 * (C7) use past tense for IANA registration that has happened
>>> 33b6c01 * (C1) 3 more word-joiners to avoid confusing line breaks
>>> 440d44a * (C6) simplify editorial memento for ES4
>>> 8076529 * (C5) Remove overzealous duplicate redundant superfluous citation
>>> c8dfc85 * (C4) Complete fix for placement of "at most".
>>> 
>>> (Details at
>>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/commits/auth48/
>>> with more explanation behind the •••.)
>>> 
>>> A diff of the plaintext renderings is at:
>>> 
>>> https://tzi.org/~cabo/9535/rfc9535.txt-from-.diff.html
>>> 
>>> With these changes, I now believe RFC9535-to-be is ready for publication.
>>> I expect the other authors will indicate their status in time.
>>> 
>>> (There is no need to wait for resolution of
>>> https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/1103
>>> — even though the tables will look slightly less cramped in plaintext when that has been fixed.)
>>> 
>>> Grüße, Carsten
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>