Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9558 <draft-makarenko-gost2012-dnssec-05> for your review

["Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear)" <[e-mail]>]

Authors, RPC:

Since this document entered the RFC Editor queue, the independent 
submissions editor has been in discussions with the IAB and the 
editorial board about national cryptography.  The following text should 
be added to the end of Section 1 of this document.

> Caution:
>
> This specification is not a standard and does not have IETF community 
> consensus.  It makes use of a cryptographic algorithm that is a 
> national standard for Russia. Neither the IETF nor the IRTF has 
> analyzed that algorithm for suitability for any given application, and 
> it may contain either intended or unintended weaknesses.
>
Note: this is not a reflection on any particular country and will be 
equally applied to *all* national cryptography, nor is it a reflection 
of any specific cryptographic quality in GOST.

Authors, I apologize for how late in this process this change is being 
requested, but that was due to the timing of discussions with the IAB 
and my editorial board.

Eliot

On 07.03.2024 23:25, [e-mail] wrote:
> *****IMPORTANT*****
>
> Updated 2024/03/07
>
> RFC Author(s):
> --------------
>
> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
>
> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and
> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies
> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
>
> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties
> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing
> your approval.
>
> Planning your review
> ---------------------
>
> Please review the following aspects of your document:
>
> *  RFC Editor questions
>
>     Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor
>     that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
>     follows:
>
>     <!-- [rfced] ... -->
>
>     These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
>
> *  Changes submitted by coauthors
>
>     Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
>     coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
>     agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
>
> *  Content
>
>     Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
>     change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>     - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>     - contact information
>     - references
>
> *  Copyright notices and legends
>
>     Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>     RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
>     (TLP –https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
>
> *  Semantic markup
>
>     Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of
>     content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode>
>     and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at
>     <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
>
> *  Formatted output
>
>     Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
>     formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is
>     reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
>     limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
>
>
> Submitting changes
> ------------------
>
> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all
> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties
> include:
>
>     *  your coauthors
>     
>     *[e-mail]  (the RPC team)
>
>     *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
>        IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
>        responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
>       
>     *[e-mail], which is a new archival mailing list
>        to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion
>        list:
>       
>       *  More info:
>          https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
>       
>       *  The archive itself:
>          https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
>
>       *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out
>          of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>          If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you
>          have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded,
>          [e-mail]  will be re-added to the CC list and
>          its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
>
> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
>
> An update to the provided XML file
>   — OR —
> An explicit list of changes in this format
>
> Section # (or indicate Global)
>
> OLD:
> old text
>
> NEW:
> new text
>
> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit
> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
>
> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text,
> and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in
> the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
>
>
> Approving for publication
> --------------------------
>
> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
> that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
>
>
> Files
> -----
>
> The files are available here:
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9558.xml
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9558.html
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9558.pdf
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9558.txt
>
> Diff file of the text:
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9558-diff.html
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9558-rfcdiff.html  (side by side)
>
> Diff of the XML:
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9558-xmldiff1.html
>
>
> Tracking progress
> -----------------
>
> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9558
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation,
>
> RFC Editor
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9558 (draft-makarenko-gost2012-dnssec-05)
>
> Title            : Use of GOST 2012 Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC
> Author(s)        : B. Makarenko, V. Dolmatov, Ed.
>