Re: [auth48] [EXTERNAL] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9406 <draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-14> for your review

Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com> Mon, 01 May 2023 22:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC98C13AE5C; Mon, 1 May 2023 15:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldBNlUKvi0Sr; Mon, 1 May 2023 15:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70C2C13AE39; Mon, 1 May 2023 15:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5B3424CD02; Mon, 1 May 2023 15:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lFPvSzG4LYw; Mon, 1 May 2023 15:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8b00:6b80:d522:c19f:e0da:255f]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51562424CD01; Mon, 1 May 2023 15:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.200.110.1.12\))
From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR00MB08510F15C87B36D114B1DEB0C36EA@BY5PR00MB0851.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 15:49:21 -0700
Cc: "pravb.ietf@gmail.com" <pravb.ietf@gmail.com>, Matt Olson <maolson@microsoft.com>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "tcpm-ads@ietf.org" <tcpm-ads@ietf.org>, "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>, "tuexen@fh-muenster.de" <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E516034B-7B26-44E9-8A77-47AE108D5900@amsl.com>
References: <20230427221206.E406A563F3@rfcpa.amsl.com> <3CF517BB-7040-4A3D-845E-7F9FCFF987ED@amsl.com> <MN2PR00MB086242D81527119C5A695F14C368A@MN2PR00MB0862.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <7B8CF13E-053D-44A6-8294-6ABE71DB668C@amsl.com> <BY5PR00MB08510F15C87B36D114B1DEB0C36EA@BY5PR00MB0851.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: Yi Huang <huanyi@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.200.110.1.12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/9qEALFxbEU_r5PbB9twr8VBDt2M>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [EXTERNAL] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9406 <draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-14> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 22:49:36 -0000

Hi, Yi.  No worries, and thank you for this prompt reply as well!

We have made further updates per your notes below.  Per your address listing, we also included "One Microsoft Way".  Please let us know if Matt's street address should be different.

The latest files are posted here.  Please refresh your browser:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406.xml
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406-diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406-rfcdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406-auth48diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406-lastdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406-lastrfcdiff.html

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406-xmldiff1.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406-xmldiff2.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9406-alt-diff.html

Thanks again!

RFC Editor/lb

> On May 1, 2023, at 3:41 PM, Yi Huang <huanyi@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Oh, my apologies. I pasted it in the wrong place.
> 
>     • "HyStart exit" should be changed to "slow start exit", which refers to the pseudocode "exit slow start and enter CSS".
>     • ECN is Explicit Congestion Notification.
> One minor issue in "Authros' Addresses" section, could you please add "Redmond, WA 98052" to Matt Olson's address to be consistent with other authors' info?
> Original:
>    Matt Olson
>    Microsoft
>    Phone: +1 425 538 8598
>    Email: maolson@microsoft.com
> 
> Proposal:
> 
>    Matt Olson
>    Microsoft
>    Redmond, WA 98052
>    Phone: +1 425 538 8598
>    Email: maolson@microsoft.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Thanks,
> Yi
> 
> From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 1, 2023 3:21 PM
> To: Yi Huang <huanyi@microsoft.com>
> Cc: pravb.ietf@gmail.com <pravb.ietf@gmail.com>; Matt Olson <maolson@microsoft.com>; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; tcpm-ads@ietf.org <tcpm-ads@ietf.org>; tcpm-chairs@ietf.org <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>; tuexen@fh-muenster.de <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>; Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>; auth48archive@rfc-editor.org <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9406 <draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-14> for your review
>  [You don't often get email from lbartholomew@amsl.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> Hi, Yi.  Thank you for your prompt reply!
> 
> We have updated this document per your notes below.
> 
> A couple quick follow-up items for you:
> 
> It appears that our question 4)b) (re. not finding "cssBaselineMinRtt" mentioned in any other RFC) was answered by this reply to question 5):
> 
> >> 5) <!-- [rfced] Section 4.2:  We defined "ECN" as "Explicit Congestion
> >> Notification" for ease of the reader.  If this definition is
> >> incorrect, please provide the correct definition of "ECN".
> >>
> >> Original:
> >>  If loss or ECN-marking is observed anytime during standard slow start
> >>  or CSS, enter congestion avoidance by setting ssthresh to current
> >>  cwnd.
> >>
> >> Currently:
> >>  If loss or Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) marking is observed
> >>  at any time during standard slow start or CSS, enter congestion
> >>  avoidance by setting the ssthresh to the current cwnd. -->
> >
> > It's referred a few paragraphs below.
> >
> > In "For CSS rounds where at least N_RTT_SAMPLE RTT samples have been obtained, check if current round's minRTT drops below baseline indicating that HyStart exit was spurious:", the word, "baseline" refers to cssBaselineMinRtt. I suggest we change the line to "For CSS rounds where at least N_RTT_SAMPLE RTT samples have been obtained, check if current round's minRTT drops below the baseline, cssBaselineMinRtt, indicating that HyStart exit was spurious:"?
> 
> First, apologies for not spotting this earlier and asking about it:  Should "HyStart exit" be "HyStart++ exit"?
> 
> Second, please let us know if our expansion of "ECN" as "Explicit Congestion Notification" is correct.  If it's not correct, please let us know how it should be defined.
> 
> = = = = =
> 
> The latest files are posted here (please refresh your browser):
> 
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.txt&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765858931693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KiEzI71dsLPf1rHZrSpasjJNJjG2r%2FgGqIsEGKg3QPw%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765858931693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4L2WZ4b0BoqwdBIIVL5arXDskpfzLPNG%2FIvGhBuyi%2BY%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765858931693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Iluhko2PDrtxK6OehJklWulma2ZBYPP0oVfMcJMrg0c%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.xml&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765858931693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=I3pRvJYIj0AZCmd4423coXxO1%2BlhiWPRvUUu%2BMNtYPY%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-diff.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765858931693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=S3%2BaN6pWk78MO4LpFcLhF%2BdLoU9svSqyKcVM0dEpKAs%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765858931693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=INje9K8H32hhiV%2BhHDatvU2Km0VZ9Eu8F0id%2B3Ey3Tk%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-auth48diff.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765858931693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LIebQ9Y4f3Bd5JINLJRL4%2F4pbdX9ZXUSR16Iz8xiGdA%3D&reserved=0
> 
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765858931693%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HbtVoJdRp2kHqsWr0IbyzxFPfHBfwXnRNZuslkcWQP4%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wFreRHq60OReL%2FFLGOGpPbV1e6NtyOkJ21pdYXlzGUw%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-xmldiff2.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7EhFO4S04dO5HtkbbitQPtYlKI%2FgQ7Z5GnS9gM4%2BHog%3D&reserved=0
>    https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=CtCpkjDbnq63a75N8LE3dIh%2FMZV4EVQ3Qgt%2BLF8Kmms%3D&reserved=0
> 
> Thanks again!
> 
> RFC Editor/lb
> 
> > On Apr 28, 2023, at 8:54 PM, Yi Huang <huanyi@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Lynne,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for reviewing and editing the doc. I have inlined our answers.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yi
> >
> >
> > From: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholomew@amsl.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 3:22 PM
> > To: pravb.ietf@gmail.com <pravb.ietf@gmail.com>; Yi Huang <huanyi@microsoft.com>; Matt Olson <maolson@microsoft.com>
> > Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; tcpm-ads@ietf.org <tcpm-ads@ietf.org>; tcpm-chairs@ietf.org <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>; tuexen@fh-muenster.de<tuexen@fh-muenster.de>; Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>; auth48archive@rfc-editor.org<auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9406 <draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-14> for your review
> >  [Some people who received this message don't often get email from lbartholomew@amsl.com. Learn why this is important athttps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> >
> > Authors,
> >
> > While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as necessary) the following questions, which are also in the XML file.
> >
> > 1) <!-- [rfced] Document title, Abstract, and Introduction:  As the term
> > "HyStart" has not been used in any published RFCs to date and the
> > word "hybrid" is not used in this document, would it be helpful to
> > define HyStart++ for readers?
> >
> > Original:
> >  HyStart++: Modified Slow Start for TCP
> > ...
> >  This document describes HyStart++, a simple modification to the slow
> >  start phase of congestion control algorithms.
> > ...
> >  HyStart++ uses increase in round-trip delay as a signal to exit slow
> >  start before potential packet loss occurs as a result of overshoot.
> >  This is one of two algorithms specified in [HyStart].
> >
> > Perhaps:
> >  HyStart++: Modified "Hybrid Start" Slow Start Algorithm for TCP
> > ...
> >  This document describes HyStart++, a simple modification to the
> >  "Hybrid Start" slow start phase of congestion control algorithms.
> > ...
> >  HyStart++, which is a modified "Hybrid Start" slow start algorithm,
> >  uses an increase in round-trip delay as a signal to exit slow
> >  start before potential packet loss occurs as a result of
> >  overshoot.  This is one of two algorithms specified in [HyStart]. -->
> >
> > How about in the introduction we modify seocnd para as:
> > HyStart++ builds upon Hybrid Start (HyStart) originally described in [HyStart]. HyStart++ uses increase in round-trip delay as a signal to exit slow start before potential packet loss occurs as a result of overshoot.
> >
> >
> > 2) <!-- [rfced] Section 1:  In this current text, "This is one of two
> > algorithms" appears to refer to HyStart++.  However, we do not see
> > HyStart++ mentioned anywhere in [HyStart].  Also, we only see one
> > algorithm defined in [HyStart]:  "We propose a new slow start
> > algorithm, called Hybrid Start (HyStart) ...").
> >
> > How can this text be clarified for readers?  For example, would
> > "[HyStart] specifies two algorithms (a "Delay Increase" algorithm and
> > an "Inter-Packet Arrival" algorithm) to be run in parallel to detect
> > that the sending rate has reached capacity" from Section 4.1 also
> > apply to this text here in Section 1?
> >
> > Original (the previous sentence and the next sentence are included
> >    for context):
> >  HyStart++ uses increase in round-trip delay as a signal to exit slow
> >  start before potential packet loss occurs as a result of overshoot.
> >  This is one of two algorithms specified in [HyStart].  After the slow
> >  start exit, a new Conservative Slow Start (CSS) phase is used to
> >  determine whether the slow start exit was premature and to resume
> >  slow start. -->
> >
> > To be clear, Hystart++ itself is not mentioned in [HyStart]. Hystart++ uses the "delay increase" algorithm in [Hystart] for detecting a safe exit point for slow start. Can we just rephrase " This is one of two algorithms specified in [HyStart]" to "This is one of two algorithms specified in [HyStart] for finding a safe exit point for slow start."?
> >
> > 3) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "type" attribute of each sourcecode
> > element in the XML file to ensure correctness.  If you would like to
> > make any changes and the current list of preferred values for "type"
> > as listed on <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fmaterials%2Fsourcecode-types.txt&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=N0zg9xpHx2HpGqGtCywDVpvLZoCCDYEGA%2BD0%2Bd3M%2Btg%3D&reserved=0>
> > does not contain an applicable type, then feel free to let us know.
> > Also, it is acceptable to leave the "type" attribute not set. -->
> >
> > Can we just not set the "type" attribute? The pseudocode doesn't map to a real programming language.
> >
> > 4) <!-- [rfced] Section 4.2:
> >
> > a) The following two lines are too long for the text output.  We get
> > the following warning:
> >
> > Warning: Too long line found (L207), 7 characters longer than 72 characters:
> >      Compute an RTT Threshold clamped between MIN_RTT_THRESH and MAX_RTT_THRESH
> > Warning: Too long line found (L208), 20 characters longer than 72 characters:
> >      RttThresh = max(MIN_RTT_THRESH, min(lastRoundMinRTT / MIN_RTT_DIVISOR, MAX_RTT_THRESH))
> >
> > Please let us know where line breaks should be placed.
> >
> > Original (the line break after "DIVISOR," is introduced by
> >   our Terminal-window-line-length constraint):
> >  Compute a RTT Threshold clamped between MIN_RTT_THRESH and MAX_RTT_THRESH
> >  RttThresh = max(MIN_RTT_THRESH, min(lastRoundMinRTT / MIN_RTT_DIVISOR, MAX_RTT_THRESH))
> >
> > Possibly:
> >  Compute an RTT Threshold clamped between MIN_RTT_THRESH and
> >    MAX_RTT_THRESH
> >  RttThresh = max(MIN_RTT_THRESH,
> >    min(lastRoundMinRTT / MIN_RTT_DIVISOR, MAX_RTT_THRESH))
> >
> > b) We do not see "cssBaselineMinRtt" used in any RFC.  Will this
> > parameter be clear to readers?
> >
> > Original:
> >  cssBaselineMinRtt = currentRoundMinRTT
> > ...
> >  if (currentRoundMinRTT < cssBaselineMinRtt)
> >    cssBaselineMinRtt = infinity -->
> >
> > I think we can remove "Compute an RTT Threshold clamped between MIN_RTT_THRESH and MAX_RTT_THRESH" as it's just an explanation of the following line, which is clear enough. The suggested line break looks good to me.
> >
> > 5) <!-- [rfced] Section 4.2:  We defined "ECN" as "Explicit Congestion
> > Notification" for ease of the reader.  If this definition is
> > incorrect, please provide the correct definition of "ECN".
> >
> > Original:
> >  If loss or ECN-marking is observed anytime during standard slow start
> >  or CSS, enter congestion avoidance by setting ssthresh to current
> >  cwnd.
> >
> > Currently:
> >  If loss or Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) marking is observed
> >  at any time during standard slow start or CSS, enter congestion
> >  avoidance by setting the ssthresh to the current cwnd. -->
> >
> > It's referred a few paragraphs below.
> >
> > In "For CSS rounds where at least N_RTT_SAMPLE RTT samples have been obtained, check if current round's minRTT drops below baseline indicating that HyStart exit was spurious:", the word, "baseline" refers to cssBaselineMinRtt. I suggest we change the line to "For CSS rounds where at least N_RTT_SAMPLE RTT samples have been obtained, check if current round's minRTT drops below the baseline, cssBaselineMinRtt, indicating that HyStart exit was spurious:"?
> >
> > 6) <!-- [rfced] Section 5:  We changed "As of February 2023" to "At the
> > time of this writing".  If this is incorrect, please provide
> > clarifying text.
> >
> > Original:
> >  As of February 2023, HyStart++ as described in this document has been
> >  default enabled for all TCP connections in the Windows operating
> >  system for over two years with pacing disabled and an actual L = 8.
> >
> > Currently:
> >  At the time of this writing, HyStart++ as described in this document
> >  has been default enabled for all TCP connections in the Windows
> >  operating system for over two years with pacing disabled and an
> >  actual L = 8. -->
> > Correct
> >
> >
> > 7) <!-- [rfced] Section 5:  Will the meaning of "HyStart++ draft 01" be
> > clear to readers?  If not, please provide clarifying text.
> >
> > Original:
> >  In an A/B test where we compare HyStart++ draft 01 to traditional
> >  slow start across a large Windows device population, out of 52
> >  billion TCP connections, 0.7% of connections move from 1 RTO to 0
> >  RTOs and another 0.7% connections move from 2 RTOs to 1 RTO with
> >  HyStart++. -->
> >
> > I would say we remove draft 01, as its not useful to the reader to implement an earlier version of the algorithm:
> >
> > "In an A/B test where we compared an implementation of HyStart++ (based on an earlier draft of this document) to traditional
> >  slow start across a large Windows device population,"
> >
> > 8) <!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the
> > online Style Guide at
> > <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fstyleguide%2Fpart2%2F%23inclusive_language&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fna%2Bl4jnCOIutZLF7gRhYqfA9O2aTWBxRYiJ1sWrrFg%3D&reserved=0>,
> > and let us know if any changes are needed.
> >
> > In addition, please consider whether "traditional" should be updated
> > for clarity.  In this document, could "standard slow start" (as seen
> > in Section 4.2) be used instead of "traditional slow start"?
> >
> > While the NIST website
> > (<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nist.gov%2Fnist-research-library%2Fnist-technical-series-publications-author-instructions%23table1&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=dsQAjS5gwI%2FiHkIcPdi0MKTspScXHzgmXdW7qMy9kwE%3D&reserved=0>)
> > indicates that this term is potentially biased, it is also ambiguous.
> > "Tradition" is a subjective term, as it is not the same for everyone. -->
> >
> > Agreed. Standard slow start is better.
> >
> > 9) <!-- [rfced] The following terms were used inconsistently in this
> > document.  We chose to use the latter forms.  Please let us know any
> > objections.
> >
> >  Hystart++ (6 instances) / HyStart++ (23 instances) (per [HyStart])
> >  INFINITY (1 instance) / infinity (11 instances) -->
> >
> > The latter forms are better, HyStart++ and infinity.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > RFC Editor/lb
> >
> > > On Apr 27, 2023, at 3:12 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> > >
> > > *****IMPORTANT*****
> > >
> > > Updated 2023/04/27
> > >
> > > RFC Author(s):
> > > --------------
> > >
> > > Instructions for Completing AUTH48
> > >
> > > Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and
> > > approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
> > > If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies
> > > available as listed in the FAQ (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ffaq%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Km80iJF%2B507uFife28VnKrJ6b9ehb%2FW9ssyBsxnTgtg%3D&reserved=0).
> > >
> > > You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties
> > > (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing
> > > your approval.
> > >
> > > Planning your review
> > > ---------------------
> > >
> > > Please review the following aspects of your document:
> > >
> > > *  RFC Editor questions
> > >
> > >   Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor
> > >   that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
> > >   follows:
> > >
> > >   <!-- [rfced] ... -->
> > >
> > >   These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
> > >
> > > *  Changes submitted by coauthors
> > >
> > >   Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
> > >   coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
> > >   agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
> > >
> > > *  Content
> > >
> > >   Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
> > >   change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
> > >   - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
> > >   - contact information
> > >   - references
> > >
> > > *  Copyright notices and legends
> > >
> > >   Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
> > >   RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
> > >   (TLP – https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrustee.ietf.org%2Flicense-info%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Eu4ESTqg%2B5CRQmTMY7hBM1P%2B7mk2u24C6MrVDT3Lh74%3D&reserved=0).
> > >
> > > *  Semantic markup
> > >
> > >   Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of
> > >   content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode>
> > >   and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at
> > >   <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fauthors.ietf.org%2Frfcxml-vocabulary&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ViQ8WcwmpmSM%2BblTwLxvPnyRb2t4MCt%2Fe%2BatpvCfnwg%3D&reserved=0>.
> > >
> > > *  Formatted output
> > >
> > >   Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
> > >   formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is
> > >   reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
> > >   limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
> > >
> > >
> > > Submitting changes
> > > ------------------
> > >
> > > To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’, as all
> > > the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes.  The parties
> > > include:
> > >
> > >   *  your coauthors
> > >
> > >   *  rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org (the RPC team)
> > >
> > >   *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
> > >      IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
> > >      responsible ADs, and the document shepherd)
> > >
> > >   *  auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, which is a new archival mailing list
> > >      to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion
> > >      list:
> > >
> > >     *  More info:
> > >        https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fietf-announce%2Fyb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5DlUoGdMfLvL0WSLRhb0kWXXG%2BSzuq%2FcLO3gNKfIvPA%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >     *  The archive itself:
> > >        https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fbrowse%2Fauth48archive%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=eVRa%2FOb%2FmWWCZ7dciQAftS9%2BqStdmgYxKiS1XazIXyY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >     *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out
> > >        of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
> > >        If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you
> > >        have dropped the address.  When the discussion is concluded,
> > >        auth48archive@rfc-editor.org will be re-added to the CC list and
> > >        its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
> > >
> > > You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
> > >
> > > An update to the provided XML file
> > > — OR —
> > > An explicit list of changes in this format
> > >
> > > Section # (or indicate Global)
> > >
> > > OLD:
> > > old text
> > >
> > > NEW:
> > > new text
> > >
> > > You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit
> > > list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
> > >
> > > We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
> > > beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text,
> > > and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in
> > > the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
> > >
> > >
> > > Approving for publication
> > > --------------------------
> > >
> > > To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
> > > that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
> > > as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
> > >
> > >
> > > Files
> > > -----
> > >
> > > The files are available here:
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.xml&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=44Z%2FMorSRPlGKIrNZVmOHHfJnyRaigSTXfTmUvbDSTk%3D&reserved=0
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EijQNL1WRShaIywRmUloo%2Fwt%2Flwc74mcrbZkX4GefrQ%3D&reserved=0
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=B1tq%2Bn%2BFq8A6hRMA78AW5VpxnWtSEBzcrxUTfz7PRb4%3D&reserved=0
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.txt&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yablartzdzAn0SheoVWMYVKxh8duEI6g3SddZNVzqy4%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Diff files of the text:
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-diff.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PBGA5tdE9MIGsZqenLmFimeeJhTFxa5U3GmojjZdjuc%3D&reserved=0
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PygCCxpyIYNqL%2BnT%2Fi5R9tKlSAQ8Rv3gtKvqOGeS%2Bio%3D&reserved=0 (side by side)
> > >
> > > For your convenience, we have also created an alt-diff file that will allow you to
> > > more easily view changes where text has been deleted or moved:
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-alt-diff.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=CtCpkjDbnq63a75N8LE3dIh%2FMZV4EVQ3Qgt%2BLF8Kmms%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Diffs of the XML:
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wFreRHq60OReL%2FFLGOGpPbV1e6NtyOkJ21pdYXlzGUw%3D&reserved=0
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406-xmldiff2.html&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7EhFO4S04dO5HtkbbitQPtYlKI%2FgQ7Z5GnS9gM4%2BHog%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own
> > > diff files of the XML.
> > >
> > > Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input:
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.original.v2v3.xml&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2B6A2zANZR9igW%2F3hpjua%2Fwg%2FfeaVY3JXunOdh7SObpk%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates
> > > only:
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9406.form.xml&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ul4n%2F2qW3Xq6RJW7JDDy1nWc0UUiFwMZDz%2BVqf3nQPo%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > Tracking progress
> > > -----------------
> > >
> > > The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
> > >   https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9406&data=05%7C01%7Chuanyi%40microsoft.com%7Cb3f83c125e6c49ea9ef708db4a926d6c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638185765859087921%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nXYMibiIq1euSE7G9EVwrEeiZ4VJ9XzJPoE2GSLZrzo%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Please let us know if you have any questions.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your cooperation.
> > >
> > > RFC Editor
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > RFC9406 (draft-ietf-tcpm-hystartplusplus-14)
> > >
> > > Title            : HyStart++: Modified Slow Start for TCP
> > > Author(s)        : P. Balasubramanian, Y. Huang, M. Olson
> > > WG Chair(s)      : Yoshifumi Nishida, Michael Tüxen, Ian Swett
> > >
> > > Area Director(s) : Martin Duke, Zaheduzzaman Sarker
> > >