IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 October 2023 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678E6C14CF1B; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2N4iUSCvEBZh; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 08:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3034C180EB2; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 08:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2791747288cso1685103a91.0; Fri, 06 Oct 2023 08:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696604650; x=1697209450; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zsM1brdDIFuk5gq8FoyaSVHwiLbB/RXoe6LxPp9TsmE=; b=b18A4k5Q/OKSOW+IB+6H3OLaTPBfC89gQmecNDAY70+jIpo9VjPpCj/Sahfb9DNkZv 2OnW628DaGMLcdmLj8DGwIUwC/sjRVtDGrVCrnTlaogoPhG27yt7xLFar4INnJXEismz r3RegWU4jVwvMEQIavHtvR2F4GOXL9SbvNKIPHuzKUphpeBe6qhRF9xkeA2H+qfT/Fz1 Dt1WD0yqmYbkBNZ65q13tArzLzh4WUirfBC9Qb4E6bN93ix1ya3AL9538Us87Bwd3YNz 4hQ9Ot100hPiwS+td9SHsW3OXoiz6CHtcVLbPC/FEhEJZ1Msl1LTWxT0YEczStQNiDOA UxKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696604650; x=1697209450; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zsM1brdDIFuk5gq8FoyaSVHwiLbB/RXoe6LxPp9TsmE=; b=kKo9nXoirm0ceOUE1Bx3vH9KxUDs4+suZtDaupNOXPL29TrzbiE0JiBsTQOKklh5je oRoCX9KYVcKgQiXtzdQUZNoAR1SWSK3O8sWVSY2EoV/WMa/AxWPVse9nVSeieaSnjY/C rc86sehgZedhemBIv5jMU8IVVmwPshD91dQmP2xBtYQENj32XEdKBjL4XUUjCRN/5g/z E8fjD/T7Tikrv0J/T/zcvJOUspCzGCGirlvGYCZ+/2O13ZjQCa3YsV3sLtfD5p3ZfB63 6FAmU6Tr8XFPq2dGCQ3pZTVzKSPBREy3K1PnotQQsiSa2+5wqaxNhxNFkrutj0groo13 jdaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyPxsZzCxdtj1uVu+azZkq/BRoDr3qNY2iRKy/L0stx14luAvVm cu97DUEnNEcLmBTTMZO/AJJZk37eJZzxe0lRQkg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGlAORjpANaT9f6CL2s5VGdtSEVVBZfDZ8gQBJuF0weCxjPFxcZ2CsLKcyDfHMuej0Hk59cprsH7cZsmGr4WXs=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1989:b0:269:851:4f00 with SMTP id mv9-20020a17090b198900b0026908514f00mr7268618pjb.35.1696604649908; Fri, 06 Oct 2023 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 11:04:08 -0400
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B16CC07F-E4C7-4A0A-8EFC-FDA9DA067EE0@amsl.com>
References: <ZRr8Pb7IU4Js6ibb@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <172EDE0F-4D21-47F6-B3C6-D959CDB935A0@amsl.com> <CAMMESsxGh=hR0Bfo6g_Xf6ZZymcG5krGzeR7Kx7r=HVL0k-yOA@mail.gmail.com> <B16CC07F-E4C7-4A0A-8EFC-FDA9DA067EE0@amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 11:04:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMMESsz8B6dB-vnAo=Qy-bvA7n+KGvj0hc0cQdtWP_66qTSMzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sarah Tarrant <starrant@amsl.com>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>, pim-chairs@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>, pim-ads@ietf.org, zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn, stig@venaas.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007b712b06070d8d9b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/KnA5mGAdU3TkXZPZKM_50mpGI74>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 15:04:41 -0000

Hi!

Please consider the document approved from my part.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On October 6, 2023 at 10:05:27 AM, Sarah Tarrant (starrant@amsl.com) wrote:

Hello Toerless and Alvaro,

Thank you for your replies. We have updated the document accordingly.

Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not
make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any
further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form.
We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the
publication process.

Updated XML file:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466.xml

Updated output files:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466.pdf

Diff file showing all changes made during AUTH48:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-auth48diff.html

Comprehensive Diffs:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-rfcdiff.html (side-by-side diff)

Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the
most recent version.

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9466

Thank you,

RFC Editor/st

> On Oct 6, 2023, at 6:52 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On October 5, 2023 at 2:11:08 PM, Sarah Tarrant wrote:
>
> Hi Sarah!
>
>> *Alvaro, as AD, please review the second bullet in Section 3.3.1 and let
us
>> know if you approve. This change is best viewed in this diff file:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-auth48diff.html.
>
> Yes, it's ok to take out the normative recommendation.
>
> Just a nit: implementations don't "want" anything, they are
> programmed to do something.
>
> s/an implementation wants to send/an implementation sends
>
> Thanks!!
>
> Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email