IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Fri, 06 October 2023 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC17C1519B2; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VwY5PpiwJo1; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B142BC14F74A; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 09:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S2CvB4bg9znkTj; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 18:05:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4S2CvB3ZjbzkZhW; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 18:05:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 18:05:26 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Sarah Tarrant <starrant@amsl.com>, Michael McBride <michael.mcbride@futurewei.com>, pim-chairs@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>, pim-ads@ietf.org, zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn, stig@venaas.com
Message-ID: <ZSAwRir6N/MGlwqy@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <ZRr8Pb7IU4Js6ibb@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <172EDE0F-4D21-47F6-B3C6-D959CDB935A0@amsl.com> <CAMMESsxGh=hR0Bfo6g_Xf6ZZymcG5krGzeR7Kx7r=HVL0k-yOA@mail.gmail.com> <B16CC07F-E4C7-4A0A-8EFC-FDA9DA067EE0@amsl.com> <CAMMESsz8B6dB-vnAo=Qy-bvA7n+KGvj0hc0cQdtWP_66qTSMzQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsz8B6dB-vnAo=Qy-bvA7n+KGvj0hc0cQdtWP_66qTSMzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/oMnqOOmKjSC0zf5k-aVXLoS2HB0>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9466 <draft-ietf-pim-assert-packing-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 16:06:11 -0000

Please consider the document also approved from my part.

Thanks!

Toerless

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:04:08AM -0400, Alvaro Retana wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Please consider the document approved from my part.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> On October 6, 2023 at 10:05:27 AM, Sarah Tarrant (starrant@amsl.com) wrote:
> 
> Hello Toerless and Alvaro,
> 
> Thank you for your replies. We have updated the document accordingly.
> 
> Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not
> make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any
> further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form.
> We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the
> publication process.
> 
> Updated XML file:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466.xml
> 
> Updated output files:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466.pdf
> 
> Diff file showing all changes made during AUTH48:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-auth48diff.html
> 
> Comprehensive Diffs:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-diff.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-rfcdiff.html (side-by-side diff)
> 
> Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view the
> most recent version.
> 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9466
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> RFC Editor/st
> 
> > On Oct 6, 2023, at 6:52 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On October 5, 2023 at 2:11:08 PM, Sarah Tarrant wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sarah!
> >
> >> *Alvaro, as AD, please review the second bullet in Section 3.3.1 and let
> us
> >> know if you approve. This change is best viewed in this diff file:
> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9466-auth48diff.html.
> >
> > Yes, it's ok to take out the normative recommendation.
> >
> > Just a nit: implementations don't "want" anything, they are
> > programmed to do something.
> >
> > s/an implementation wants to send/an implementation sends
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > Alvaro.

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email