Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9301 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-31> for your review

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

On September 19, 2022 at 12:35:28 PM, Alanna Paloma wrote:


Alanna:

Hi!


> Luigi and *Alvaro (AD) - This query requires your review/approval:

> > >  14) <!-- [rfced] Section 5.4:
> > >
> > >  [AD] Version 30 was approved; we were notified that version 31 was
> > > available earlier this year. Please review and let us know if you approve
> > > the new text.
> > > The update can easily be seen here:
> > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-31.txt

Yes, these changes are approved.  They were made in coordination with
rfc6834bis.


> > > Authors, we could not locate the indicated procedures in draft-ietf-lisp-
> > > 6834bis.
> > > Please clarify for readers where in draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis (perhaps a
> > > section number) this information can be found.
> > >
> > >  Original:
> > > Map-Version Number: When this 12-bit value in an EID-record of a
> > > Map-Reply message is non-zero, follow the procedures in
> > > [I-D.ietf-lisp-6834bis] for details. -->
> >
> > Luigi needs to answer this question.

The reference is not to a specific set of procedures, but to
rfc6834bis in general.

Suggestion>
   Map-Version Number: When this 12-bit value in an EID-record of
   a Map-Reply message is non-zero; see [I-D.ietf-lisp-6834bis] for
   details.


Thanks!

Alvaro.