IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9301 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-31> for your review

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 20 September 2022 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F68C1524B5; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B5Et1qD7ac4A; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56DAC1524AA; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id h188so3666446pgc.12; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qc1c0Lh5LELOmD8wMIV1n+pe16rHELqtlleVDxiSd0I=; b=D3X4AXz9JQmzJNQTyXoVO8wdYpl0KGUdVBOwsFD1zXSCYQRHnxxQvk7DJ7WV0Iz6mP FKoPRelXQdfDlZASQ0bUB8D30PCnLeTc+1PjCOeQvCRUxDUZfLVH9O/INmFfqN+j8NTI af0+7vwUfTkq+sMbTvJ9Xwci+KOf3puozkUiisOSlLdyABSMFZVl5y9/8NGyPrx/n2vP q744Ycue9tC5hqvXqJtCpE6isslxF0XJ0GypTW9SH+WxrxYzTctd+H5sXlMrR+fW+TkY GsN4Uydyry9GQlLv3isuAO0/PSdq8y5yxrXV4KfMR4gyvfWVOHB2GFOeoKEo20kyQJS4 MB2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=qc1c0Lh5LELOmD8wMIV1n+pe16rHELqtlleVDxiSd0I=; b=3fFlZVMfsnM2W6E8AVs4Icby9m/n/I6aZljXneswFBAOumkRFGNz6DWS6/qm3SlFyw RHk79bKrgRj/p65Iqoedu4XixT1jgk7gdcp88e+EI9ZWlIvB0xmPhiSNloNGqvh+G/1g jZKEo7xkiyfZOcvueCeCs2upENT9xgUINvnNjmUc2Z2P+TRgIJGPnfhGGRLQBuHSozUd Qk8WspdNSkJl5+YG0/9WxZN2aEV8y7bTEGY4hS80T+IITMt3MHvj9B6TLGnCCmu0CiaT PA5nQvpgQGat1+s8xOygFeXM6T68C8QvKrrFI9WCcLmuSLYXII2cWrswZO1UJusv7brh Ea7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1XBDFLkLNOHkjrCUDCmOhV9eGE5aoC9w5YN2rSMO+/28Kw2Mvh fWBY24dPGc9DUGCC36iu5dlJ+8hDJLk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5uNZR0Gl2g2aJ7yv97w47jkPtXzdsEdtRxYJQdH+Rm0XEwWvROFa3pEDeDJoURC8VeZWai7w==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:2503:0:b0:538:426a:af11 with SMTP id l3-20020a622503000000b00538426aaf11mr25728408pfl.22.1663702442386; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-98-234-33-188.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.234.33.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k66-20020a628445000000b00536b2483aedsm253046pfd.199.2022.09.20.12.34.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FE04F5E-8D91-4B53-B36D-35FE3CF7EC53@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:34:00 -0700
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, Albert Cabellos <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, lisp-ads@ietf.org, vaf@vaf.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <969F3B8A-E0FA-4624-94C7-D1C995EEEBC9@gmail.com>
References: <20220916054815.E922755A51@rfcpa.amsl.com> <2BD3D54E-2F4C-4D74-834D-288643B17104@gmail.com> <04EC0832-7D56-4874-85B3-32A6E3F85B2E@gmail.com> <9BE05C65-4990-47D8-9704-B3A26BD43F19@amsl.com> <CAMMESsyoa2V-ZmgkpC9z8g0R4e-ub3oYpHiNmsSRQg90YoX0KA@mail.gmail.com> <4FE04F5E-8D91-4B53-B36D-35FE3CF7EC53@amsl.com>
To: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/_Rtbc6jBZDu7SVkRvdfeKDa0mqY>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9301 <draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-31> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:34:05 -0000

> Apologies for the confusion. In the text denoted by “Original” in the query below, should a section number be included with the citation for clarity?

I think referencing just the lisp-sec RFC is sufficient. Because the S-bit is used in many cases in lisp-sec.

> 21) <!-- [rfced] Section 5.8:  This sentence is difficult to follow, as
>> we only see one instance of the word "procedure" (used in the
>> singular) in draft-ietf-lisp-sec and could not find the relevant
>> information.  Please clarify for readers where in draft-ietf-lisp-sec
>> (perhaps a section number) this information can be found.
>> 
>> Original:
>> S:    This is the Security bit.  When set to 1, the field following
>>     the 'Reserved' field will have the following Authentication
>>     Data format and follow the procedures from [I-D.ietf-lisp-sec]. -->
> 
> Additionally, please note that we have updated the text to use “LISP Packet Type” (capitalized), per input from the authors of RFC-to-be 9304.

That is fine.

Thanks,
Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email